Ferenc Kovacs in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 18:36:08 +0200):
>> ADD_EXTENSION_DEP('memcache', 'session');
>that was introduced in
>http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pecl/wincache/trunk/config.w32?r1=324182&r2=324181&pathrev=324182
OK. I can see you are quite more experienced with svn than I am ;-)
Jan
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:37 +0200):
> >why don't you ask the authors directly instead of using random binaries?
>
> It seems you are (maybe without knowing it) one of those authors. The
> 1.3.0RC1 of the PECL wincache
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:37 +0200):
>why don't you ask the authors directly instead of using random binaries?
It seems you are (maybe without knowing it) one of those authors. The
1.3.0RC1 of the PECL wincache sources contained the line:
ADD_EXTENSION_DEP('memcache', 'ses
It is no random binary. It is the wincache 1.3.0RC1 PECL release:
http://pecl.php.net/package/WinCache/1.3.0
I reported back to MS in this thread:
http://forums.iis.net/t/1187707.aspx
Jan
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 8 May 2012 09:28:37 +0200):
>why don't you ask the authors directly instead
hi!
why don't you ask the authors directly instead of using random binaries?
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> "Keith Davis" in php.windows (Mon, 7 May 2012 18:39:09 -0500):
>>Wait. Did you compile 1.3.0? We were never told that this was compiled
>>and we're actively working
"Keith Davis" in php.windows (Mon, 7 May 2012 18:39:09 -0500):
>Wait. Did you compile 1.3.0? We were never told that this was compiled
>and we're actively working with MS to get this done.
>
>http://forums.iis.net/t/1187707.aspx
As you can see at http://x32.elijst.nl/phpinfo.php5f I compiled the
W
