[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the addition Jochem.. one reason I post here, even if it's a basic
example, is because if there's a better way or a chance to learn something new,
I want to have that opportunity. Thanks again!
TG,
its a pleasure. I often find it fun just to write stuff
Well to give my .02 here.
Why even go through the second foreach? By doing this you are making your code
very inefficient in
that it must read through the entire set of arrays. Sure it works fine if you
have only a few. But
if there are a few thousand it takes longer.
As the arrays are structu
Thanks for the addition Jochem.. one reason I post here, even if it's a basic
example, is because if there's a better way or a chance to learn something new,
I want to have that opportunity. Thanks again!
-TG
= = = Original message = = =
Id like to continue where TG left off ...
hth.
[EMAI
