>
Berber-Guy,
I don't believe that there is any question today that apache [on ony platform],
is the best webserver you *can't* buy ;)
ingo baab
> > Guys,
> >
> > I don't believe that there is any question today that IIS5 on win2K
> > is the best webserver $$$ can buy.
> >
> > Sincerely
> >
> >
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Tom Mathews
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
Tom,
Thanks. I believe myaccess2000_1_4 is one of the ones I've tried. I'll try
again to make sure I didn't miss anything. I used dbt
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Dan Malcolm'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Mathews"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 11:23 AM
Subject: [PHP-WIN] RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] For My Information
> 1) I think that people use Apache as old versions of IIS were crap. I
1) I think that people use Apache as old versions of IIS were crap. In addition, it is
about the widest used server out there in the commercial world (Linux running Apache
with PHP3 is I believe the most common config at the moment) so if you're developing
something to put on such a site, it's
I see in the posts, that a lot of people are using Apache on NT instead of the built
in IIS. Is there a reason? I have PHP up and running with dBase tables converted to
MySQL and ODBC connected to Access 2000, on an NT 4 box with IIS 4 and it runs very
well. Performance is great. My only pr
