All makes good sense.
Will check out code, etc.
Thanks
Jacob Kruger
Blind Biker
Skype: BlindZA
'...fate had broken his body, but not his spirit...'
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Roett"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Alternative methods for stori
The answer is "it depends" and in some very specialized situations storing
binaries in the database might be the best solution. But in general, this
approach will cause you serious problems.
Some ramifications:
1) Browsers won't cache the images. So you'll take a CPU and bandwidth hit
every time
Definitely makes sense with regard to site performance, but, sort of in past
used something like this in ASP.Net to sort of/partially make sure only
signed in users/browsers could then actually 'see' images, etc., but, that
could also be handled easily enough using a form of server-side
redirec
Jacob,
I have a gallery i created with a Java template, PHP, and MYSQL.
In the admin section you create category's and upload the images to a folder
eg: Pictures
On upload the script water marks and creates Thumb nails for use in the
gallery.
http://www.helenshappyhome.co.uk/gallery.php
Visito
Just wondering if it's better to either store uploaded images, via something
like a form of CMS, in a static folder, with a unique name based on something
like the data record's id field, when keeping track of it's location like that,
or is it better to actually store the binary data of the imag
