On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> There's no any "fork" and nobody ever presented it as "the only usable
> binary distributions for windows".
> Applying patches between releases is how most of binary distros always
> worked (provided there are patches important for thei
Hi!
As being both my concerns are to actually see a kind of fork of PHP,
being presented as the only usable binary distributions for windows
and other platforms (and for apache too).
There's no any "fork" and nobody ever presented it as "the only usable
binary distributions for windows".
Appl
hi,
The only fact that you build 5.2 with VC8 means that you apply patches
not present in php 5.2 (eventually in 5.3).
About moving to VC9 for 5.3, given that we have moved to VC9 and
everything is going well so far, that sounds like a logical move.
But why would you provide your own binaries wi
I am very biased (full disc., I'm the technical PM of Zend Server) but
let me try to answer some of this, and maybe some of the concerns that
have been raised in this thread (and in other places). I'm trying to be
as transparent as possible, maybe this will help you decide whether or
not ZSCE is fo
