Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3

2002-05-27 Thread Peter
e way my site is designed .. Regards Peter Goggin - Original Message - From: "Ryugen Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Julie Meloni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:13 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PH

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3

2002-05-27 Thread Peter
i" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:13 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3 > At 09:35 AM 5/27/2002, Peter Goggin wrote: > >I have checked file extensions at dos level and they are correct, e.g. > >x.htm. y.php etc > > > >I

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3

2002-05-27 Thread Ryugen Fisher
-- Original Message - >From: "Ryugen Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: "Julie Meloni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 10:13 AM >Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3 > > > > At 09

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3

2002-05-27 Thread Ryugen Fisher
At 09:35 AM 5/27/2002, Peter Goggin wrote: >I have checked file extensions at dos level and they are correct, e.g. >x.htm. y.php etc > >I have used sample php files sent to me and they still do not work, >displaying only the parts of the file that are not tagged at php code. The >php code appears

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3

2002-05-27 Thread Peter Goggin
skipped over y the web browser. Regards Peter Goggin - Original Message - From: "Julie Meloni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter Goggin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:01 AM Subject: Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apach

Re[2]: [PHP-INST] PHP with apache 1.3

2002-05-27 Thread Julie Meloni
PG> I still havnt got PHP to work. When I start Apache in a console window it PG> says: PG> Apache/1.3.24 (Win32) PHP/4.2.1 running ... PG> This implies the two are working together, yet php sections of web pages are PG> not parsed. Where should I start looking for the problem? Look for an incor