Re: [PHP-INST] problems with apache 2.0.43 and newest snapshot

2002-12-11 Thread Josh Marcus
well. anyway. jeez. i resolved this by finally trying to use apache 2.0.36 against php 4.2.2. why am i not surprised apache2 adaption is slow. :) --j On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:20:06PM -0500, Josh Marcus wrote: > Thanks for the comments! > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:55:11PM +, Chri

Re: [PHP-INST] problems with apache 2.0.43 and newest snapshot

2002-12-11 Thread Josh Marcus
Thanks for the comments! On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:55:11PM +, Chris Hewitt wrote: > It will complain if httpd.conf contains something it does not > understand. One test I do to check Apache is actually looking at the > httpd.conf I am editing is to put some rubbish in it and check Apache >

Re: [PHP-INST] problems with apache 2.0.43 and newest snapshot

2002-12-11 Thread Chris Hewitt
Josh Marcus wrote: I'm running linux. Redhat 6.2. That is rather old now. Does it use the syntax in httpd.conf? Oops, if you've installed new Apache versions presumably not? I have now tried a number of different relatively new apaches, with a number of recent phps. And I always can compi

Re: [PHP-INST] problems with apache 2.0.43 and newest snapshot

2002-12-11 Thread Josh Marcus
I thought I'd try and add some additional information to try and draw out some help. I'm running linux. Redhat 6.2. I have now tried a number of different relatively new apaches, with a number of recent phps. And I always can compile fine. And apache doesn't complain. but it doesn't list the

[PHP-INST] problems with apache 2.0.43 and newest snapshot

2002-12-10 Thread Josh Marcus
Hey, I'm trying to compile php for use with apache 2.0.43. php compiles fine. But apache doesn't seem to actually be loading the module. php isn't listed in the startup errorlog line, nor in server-status. .php pages get presented as their source. Is there something about the configuration I'