Re: [PHP-INST] php 4.2.2 + apache2.0.40

2002-08-26 Thread Laurent Larquère
>>Jeff >> >> >> >>Nick Couchman >><[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ken Jeansson >> >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>m>

Re: [PHP-INST] php 4.2.2 + apache2.0.40

2002-08-26 Thread Gilberto J. Palau
if you want to go that way though > > Jeff > > > > Nick Couchman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ken Jeansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > m> cc: >

Re: [PHP-INST] php 4.2.2 + apache2.0.40

2002-08-26 Thread Gilberto J. Palau
charm. > don't know if you want to go that way though > > Jeff > > > > Nick Couchman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ken Jeansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > m>

Re: [PHP-INST] php 4.2.2 + apache2.0.40

2002-08-14 Thread Jeffrey_N_Dyke
cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: [PHP-INST] php 4.2.2 + apache2.0.40

Re: [PHP-INST] php 4.2.2 + apache2.0.40

2002-08-14 Thread Nick Couchman
Unfortunately from experience and from other discussions on this list, that would seem to be a correct conclusion. --Nick Ken Jeansson wrote: > Hmm, this seems to be a non working combination even with the latest > snapshot dated 14 august > > Say that I am wrong!... please =) > > // Ken > > --

[PHP-INST] php 4.2.2 + apache2.0.40

2002-08-14 Thread Ken Jeansson
Hmm, this seems to be a non working combination even with the latest snapshot dated 14 august Say that I am wrong!... please =) // Ken -- PHP Install Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php