Re: Re[2]: [PHP] OO parent/child relationship

On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 23:37, Tom Rogers wrote: > Hi, > > Well I must have missed that one :) > My answer, if GLOBALS were not meant to be used they wouldn't be there.. > So if they make life easier go ahead and use them. I notice a lot of 'purists' > on this list that want things done a certain wa

Re[2]: [PHP] OO parent/child relationship

Hi, Well I must have missed that one :) My answer, if GLOBALS were not meant to be used they wouldn't be there.. So if they make life easier go ahead and use them. I notice a lot of 'purists' on this list that want things done a certain way but the bottom line is do what your comfortable with and

Re[2]: [PHP] OO parent/child relationship

Hi, Monday, October 6, 2003, 3:20:08 AM, you wrote: GS> Dan Anderson wrote: >>Out of curiousity, what exactly are you trying to do? Are you sure this >>type of framework is most appropriate (and easiest to implement?) >> GS> In my current setup, the more classes Im adding to the code, the more