On Thursday 21 February 2008 13:41:20 Jason Pruim wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Richard Heyes wrote:
> Spider webs have existed for many a year...
> >>
> >>Not long before the eggs hatched.
> >
> > Debatable.
>
> Are we about to go into another chicken/egg then? Or in this case,
>
On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Richard Heyes wrote:
Spider webs have existed for many a year...
Not long before the eggs hatched.
Debatable.
Are we about to go into another chicken/egg then? Or in this case,
spider porn/egg
--
Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialis
"A form" of the web existing long before that depending on your
definition of the web. To me it's a way for people to share
information. That would cover the BBS world which pre-dates LANs by
some distance.
Spider webs have existed for many a year...
Yeah, but when was the last time you sa
Spider webs have existed for many a year...
Not long before the eggs hatched.
Debatable.
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk
Knowledge Base and Helpdesk software hosted for you - no
installation, no maintenance, new features automatic and free
--
PHP General Mailing L
"A form" of the web existing long before that depending on your
definition of the web. To me it's a way for people to share
information. That would cover the BBS world which pre-dates LANs by
some distance.
Spider webs have existed for many a year...
Yeah, but when was the last time you saw
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 17:07 +, Stut wrote:
> Richard Heyes wrote:
> >> "A form" of the web existing long before that depending on your
> >> definition of the web. To me it's a way for people to share
> >> information. That would cover the BBS world which pre-dates LANs by
> >> some distance
On Feb 20, 2008 12:07 PM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Heyes wrote:
> >> "A form" of the web existing long before that depending on your
> >> definition of the web. To me it's a way for people to share
> >> information. That would cover the BBS world which pre-dates LANs by
> >> some d
Richard Heyes wrote:
"A form" of the web existing long before that depending on your
definition of the web. To me it's a way for people to share
information. That would cover the BBS world which pre-dates LANs by
some distance.
Spider webs have existed for many a year...
Yeah, but when was
"A form" of the web existing long before that depending on your
definition of the web. To me it's a way for people to share information.
That would cover the BBS world which pre-dates LANs by some distance.
Spider webs have existed for many a year...
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.websupportsolut
Jason Pruim wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 10:42 PM, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:43 AM, Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't do that.
Some sites may or may not us
On Feb 20, 2008 11:47 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > Jocularity aside, DNS was invented in 1983 (shortly after TCP/IP),
> > whereas the WorldWide Web was first "invented" in 1990. However, if
>
> 1989 actually.
Without putting too much issue into semantics,
On Feb 20, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 10:42 PM, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 4:43 AM, Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Don't do that.
Some sites may or may not use www. for whateve
Daniel Brown wrote:
Jocularity aside, DNS was invented in 1983 (shortly after TCP/IP),
whereas the WorldWide Web was first "invented" in 1990. However, if
1989 actually.
you remember ENQUIRE (on ARPANET), which was created by Tom
Berners-Lee (I had to look up his name, I couldn't remembe
On Feb 19, 2008 10:42 PM, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2008 4:43 AM, Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Don't do that.
> > > > Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
> > > > Usually screwed-u
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 4:43 AM, Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Don't do that.
> > > Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
> > > Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompetent sysadmins, but there
> > > it is...
> >
> > Re
Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't do that.
> > Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
> > Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompetent sysadmins, but there
> > it is...
>
> Really? So
>
> games.yahoo.com
> blogreport.salon.com
> mirror1.downloads.com
>
These new kids have no respect. ;-P
On Feb 19, 2008 2:33 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, February 19, 2008 3:43 am, Christoph wrote:
> >> Don't do that.
> >> Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
> >> Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompe
On Tue, February 19, 2008 3:43 am, Christoph wrote:
>> Don't do that.
>> Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
>> Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompetent sysadmins, but
>> there
>> it is...
>
> Really? So
>
> games.yahoo.com
> blogreport.salon.com
> mirror1.downloads
On Feb 19, 2008 4:43 AM, Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't do that.
> > Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
> > Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompetent sysadmins, but there
> > it is...
>
> Really? So
>
> games.yahoo.com
> blogreport.salon.com
> mirror1.
On Feb 19, 2008, at 3:43 AM, Christoph wrote:
Don't do that.
Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompetent sysadmins, but there
it is...
Really? So
games.yahoo.com
blogreport.salon.com
mirror1.downloads.com
are examples of screwed
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 10:43:04 Christoph wrote:
> > Don't do that.
> > Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
> > Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompetent sysadmins, but there
> > it is...
>
> Really? So
>
> games.yahoo.com
> blogreport.salon.com
> mirror1.download
Don't do that.
Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever reason...
Usually screwed-up A-name records by incompetent sysadmins, but there
it is...
Really? So
games.yahoo.com
blogreport.salon.com
mirror1.downloads.com
are examples of screwed up records by incompetent sysadmins?
thnx,
Chr
On Fri, February 15, 2008 2:46 pm, nihilism machine wrote:
> this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
> redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
> www.www.mydomain.com
> , any ideas?
Don't do that.
Some sites may or may not use www. for whatever rea
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote:
> nihilism machine wrote:
>> this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
>> redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
>>
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote:
nihilism machine wrote:
this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
If you are running Ap
Jim Lucas wrote:
Valedol wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:46:57 +0300, nihilism machine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
checkWWW();
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:45:54 +0300, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Valedol wrote:
just try "if ($POS !== 0) {"
well, that said, isn't the first position in a string 0 ?
So, in the above example the OP would need
// This would mean that www. was found any where in the string
if ( $P
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>> Jim Lucas wrote:
>>> nihilism machine wrote:
this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
>>> If you are running
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Jim Lucas wrote:
>> nihilism machine wrote:
>>> this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
>>> redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
>>> www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
>>>
>> If you are running Apache, you do realize that al
Jim Lucas wrote:
> nihilism machine wrote:
>> this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
>> redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
>> www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
>>
>
> If you are running Apache, you do realize that all of this can be done
> in
Jim Lucas wrote:
If you are running Apache, you do realize that all of this can be done
in Apache instead of PHP right?
.htaccess example:
# Power-up the rewrite engine:
RewriteEngine on
# Redirect all non-www traffic:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^mysite\.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^/?(.*)$ http://www.
nihilism machine wrote:
this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
If you are running Apache, you do realize that all of this can be done
in Apache instead of PHP right?
Valedol wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:46:57 +0300, nihilism machine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
// Public Functions
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:46:57 +0300, nihilism machine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
www.www.mydomain.com, any ideas?
checkWWW();
$this->ServerName
I'm sorry, the thread to which I was referring is "check if
website has www. in front of domain".
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Go back to the original thread you started (https ).
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:46 PM, nihilism machine
>
Go back to the original thread you started (https ).
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:46 PM, nihilism machine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this still does not work, if a domain has no preceeding www. it
> redirects to http://www.www.site.com, if it has a www. it goes to
> www.www.mydomain.com
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
