On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Charlene Wroblewski wrote:
*joining the fray a little late*
What is the difference between this, Smarty and template.inc?
I have found Smarty to be unusable in my situation where a graphic designer
needs to be able to edit the html and is easily confused by non-html.
So
*joining the fray a little late*
What is the difference between this, Smarty and template.inc?
I have found Smarty to be unusable in my situation where a graphic
designer needs to be able to edit the html and is easily confused by
non-html.
So, I am using template.inc which is apparently ol
Lol! Omg, you guys make reading my email so much more fun!
Cheers!
Micky
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 19:29, tedd wrote:
> At 3:21 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >Your kidding right? What you say above and what you say below are
> >different. You must think I'm stupid. Oh well.
>
>
> Robert !
>
> Hey, don't get shorts in a knot -- I didn't mean anything of the s
Martin Alterisio wrote:
> 2006/6/28, Jon Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
>> template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
>> really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
>> ba
At 5:34 PM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Alterisio wrote:
>Have you (all of you questioning the use of templates) ever worked in a
>project with more than one developer, where part of the team ARE NOT coders?
>WE understand code, but that's not the case for everyone else. Graphic
>designers don't like code
At 3:39 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
>When did I ask you or anyone other than Tedd if they were living in a
>cave?
Yeah, that's right -- he didn't infer that anyone else lived in a cave, just me.
If you want anyone else to tell you that you live in a cave, then you'll have
to stand
At 3:28 PM -0400 6/28/06, John Nichel wrote:
>
>
>
>
>--
>John C. Nichel IV
>Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
>Dot Com Holdings of Buffalo
>716.856.9675
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/* please note the humor tags */
Does that mean because I agreed with you, I'm now off your killfile list?
Or does my r
At 3:21 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
>Your kidding right? What you say above and what you say below are
>different. You must think I'm stupid. Oh well.
Robert !
Hey, don't get shorts in a knot -- I didn't mean anything of the sort. I seldom
deliberately go out of my way to insult an
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:35, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:11, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >> Paul Novitski wrote:
> >>> Hey kids,
> >> hi mom.
> >
> > Dad had an operation?
>
> an invalid type conversion?
I dunno, did you try it? Did you catch anything? Maybe
At 12:11 AM +0200 6/29/06, Jochem Maas wrote:
>Paul Novitski wrote:
>> Hey kids,
>
>hi mom.
Oh no, not another one of those talks?
What did I do this time? I wasn't anywhere near it, and no one saw me anyway.
Besides mom, you should take some time off -- you appear to be wrapped a bit
tight. Li
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:11, Jochem Maas wrote:
>> Paul Novitski wrote:
>>> Hey kids,
>> hi mom.
>
> Dad had an operation?
an invalid type conversion?
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:11, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Paul Novitski wrote:
> > Hey kids,
>
> hi mom.
Dad had an operation?
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
:--
Paul Novitski wrote:
> Hey kids,
hi mom.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
1:15 PM
To: PHP-General
Subject: [PHP] cool your jets [WAS: Re: [PHP] working on a template
system...]
Hey kids,
I thought I was joining a PHP list, not a snarky ego-fest. I assume most of
us are trying to get work done around here and are interested in programming
Q&A. Please take
Jay Blanchard wrote:
/dev/null comes to mind.
/dev/null came to my mind once. Not really sure what happened after that.
-Stut
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
2006/6/28, Jon Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
bad or messy...
/* The Smarty way */
$smar
[snip]
Can anyone recommend another PHP list where there's a much higher
signal-to-noise ratio?
[/snip]
/dev/null comes to mind.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hey kids,
I thought I was joining a PHP list, not a snarky ego-fest. I assume
most of us are trying to get work done around here and are interested
in programming Q&A. Please take your squabbles off-list or re-title
them. They're off-topic and a waste of everyone's else's time. Yeah
I've
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:39, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:28, John Nichel wrote:
> > Robert Cummings wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
> > >> At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are sup
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:28, John Nichel wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
> >> At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be
> reduced to simplistic solutions.
> >>> Tha
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be reduced
to simplistic solutions.
That's right, and a template engine simplifies the complexity.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:10, tedd wrote:
> At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >
> > > Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be
> > > reduced to simplistic solutions.
> >
> >That's right, and a template engine simplifies the complexity.
> >
> >Cheers,
>
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > Not meaning to be contrary, but complex situations are supposed to be
> > reduced to simplistic solutions.
>
>That's right, and a template engine simplifies the complexity.
>
>Cheers,
>Rob.
Okay, whatever tools work for you.
Like we used to
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 14:10, tedd wrote:
> At 2:02 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:55, Jon Anderson wrote:
> >> I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
> >> template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
> >> rea
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 14:19, Jon Anderson wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > Simplistic examples don't properly illustrate the mess that occurs in
> > complex situations.
> However, a simplistic example does properly illustrate my point nicely.
> I could even take one of my complex multi-page sma
Robert Cummings wrote:
Simplistic examples don't properly illustrate the mess that occurs in
complex situations.
However, a simplistic example does properly illustrate my point nicely.
I could even take one of my complex multi-page smarty templates, run and
perl script to convert it, and end up
At 2:02 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
>On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:55, Jon Anderson wrote:
>> I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
>> template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
>> really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:28:43 -0400, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
>>
>>Because it's a mess.
>>
>
> That's because it got out of hand. Now, practice the 3R's, regroup,
> rethink, and redo.
Already did. That's when I started to use a template
At 1:55 PM -0400 6/28/06, Jon Anderson wrote:
>I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a template
>system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's really a matter of
>preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly bad or messy...
>
>/* The Smarty way */
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:59, tedd wrote:
> At 1:30 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:28, tedd wrote:
> >> At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Martin Marques wrote:
> >> >>>Why not try to u
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 13:55, Jon Anderson wrote:
> I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
> template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
> really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
> bad or messy...
>
> /* The Sma
At 1:30 PM -0400 6/28/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
>On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:28, tedd wrote:
>> At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
>> >On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
>> >
>> >>Martin Marques wrote:
>> >>>Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
>>
I really don't understand why people have such disregard for PHP as a
template system... I'm not saying one way is better or worse (it's
really a matter of preference), just that the PHP way isn't implicitly
bad or messy...
/* The Smarty way */
$smarty->assign('display_variable',$display_varia
2006/6/28, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 07:32, Martin Marques wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
>
> > Martin Marques wrote:
> >> Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
> >> HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
> >>
> > Or jus
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:28, tedd wrote:
> At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
> >On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
> >
> >>Martin Marques wrote:
> >>>Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
> >>>HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
> >>>
> >>Or just use
At 8:32 AM -0300 6/28/06, Martin Marques wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
>
>>Martin Marques wrote:
>>>Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
>>>HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
>>>
>>Or just use PHP...
>
>Because it's a mess.
>
That's because it g
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 07:32, Martin Marques wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
>
> > Martin Marques wrote:
> >> Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
> >> HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
> >>
> > Or just use PHP...
>
> Because it's a mess.
Agre
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Ligaya Turmelle wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
Or just use PHP...
Because it's a mess.
--
21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18
Martin Marques wrote:
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:22:42 +0300, sempsteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi, i'm working on a template system. Basically i'm building raw
contents in arrays and then put the
Why not try to use one of the template systems that already exist?
HTML_Template_IT, Smarty, etc.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:22:42 +0300, sempsteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, i'm working on a template system. Basically i'm building raw
> contents in arrays and then put them in templates by som
41 matches
Mail list logo
