tedd wrote:
Hard drives. You wusses. Between punch cards, data cassettes, 5-1/4
and 8" floppies, it was years before I saw a hard drive.
--
John C. Nichel IV
I didn't say that HD's were my first storage medium. I remember typing
in 200+ line Star Trek program three times trying to get my G
Hard drives. You wusses. Between punch cards, data cassettes,
5-1/4 and 8" floppies, it was years before I saw a hard drive.
--
John C. Nichel IV
I didn't say that HD's were my first storage medium. I remember
typing in 200+ line Star Trek program three times trying to get my GE
tape recor
tedd wrote:
At 8:50 AM -0600 3/29/06, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Read up on the history of computers -- the first programmer, as I
recall, was one Lady Lovelace who programmed Babbage's first
mechanical computer (if you don't count the abacus) in the early
1800's.
Of course, I remember program
tedd wrote:
> At 3:56 PM +0100 3/29/06, Dan Parry wrote:
>
>> I can see a pattern emerging here...
>>
>> Chaos? You had chaos? All we had was this sodding great explosion...
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Dan
>
>
> Great explosion!? You had a Great explosion!?
>
> All we had was xml and everyone knows you can
At 10:39 AM -0600 3/29/06, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
You're welcome. As this list gets to know me, I think you'll find I
have a slightly different, and often humorous, perspective on
everything. As Oscar Wilde once said "Life is far too important to be
taken seriously."
[/snip]
He also said th
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
You're welcome. As this list gets to know me, I think you'll find I
have a slightly different, and often humorous, perspective on
everything. As Oscar Wilde once said "Life is far too important to be
taken seriously."
[/snip]
He also said that life was to short to
At 8:50 AM -0600 3/29/06, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Read up on the history of computers -- the first programmer, as I
recall, was one Lady Lovelace who programmed Babbage's first
mechanical computer (if you don't count the abacus) in the early
1800's.
Of course, I remember programming with roc
On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
You're welcome. As this list gets to know me, I think you'll find I
have a slightly different, and often humorous, perspective on
everything. As Oscar Wilde once said "Life is far too important to be
taken seriously."
[/snip]
He also sa
At 3:56 PM +0100 3/29/06, Dan Parry wrote:
I can see a pattern emerging here...
Chaos? You had chaos? All we had was this sodding great explosion...
:-)
Dan
Great explosion!? You had a Great explosion!?
All we had was xml and everyone knows you can't do anything with that.
:-)
tedd
--
---
[snip]
You're welcome. As this list gets to know me, I think you'll find I
have a slightly different, and often humorous, perspective on
everything. As Oscar Wilde once said "Life is far too important to be
taken seriously."
[/snip]
He also said that life was to short to dance with ugly women,
At 8:43 AM -0600 3/29/06, Philip Thompson wrote:
On Mar 29, 2006, at 8:25 AM, tedd wrote:
I have been programming since the mid 70's and foo was in the lexcon at
that point. I guess I am old school.
People have been programming since the 70's?!!?!! I didn't think
it was possible until the e
On 3/29/06, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Read up on the history of computers -- the first programmer, as I
> recall, was one Lady Lovelace who programmed Babbage's first
> mechanical computer (if you don't count the abacus) in the early
> 1800's.
>
> Of course, I remember p
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2006 15:46
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] private $foo
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 15:43, Philip Thompson wrote:
> > Of course, I remember programming with rocks and that was before we
> > had zero's. We only had one
[snip]
Read up on the history of computers -- the first programmer, as I
recall, was one Lady Lovelace who programmed Babbage's first
mechanical computer (if you don't count the abacus) in the early
1800's.
Of course, I remember programming with rocks and that was before we
had zero's. We only
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 15:43, Philip Thompson wrote:
> > Of course, I remember programming with rocks and that was before we
> > had zero's. We only had one's and that was a programming nightmare.
> > You new guys at least have 1's and 0's to work with.
> > tedd
>
> I laughed my head off ab
On Mar 29, 2006, at 8:25 AM, tedd wrote:
I have been programming since the mid 70's and foo was in the
lexcon at
that point. I guess I am old school.
People have been programming since the 70's?!!?!! I didn't think
it was possible until the early 90's! Wow I must be young! ;)
~Philip
I have been programming since the mid 70's and foo was in the lexcon at
that point. I guess I am old school.
People have been programming since the 70's?!!?!! I didn't think it
was possible until the early 90's! Wow I must be young! ;)
~Philip
~Philip:
Read up on the history of computers
On Mar 28, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
That's interesting -- not meaning any disrespect, and this is just an
opinion -- but in the newly published "PHP Phrasebook" by Christian
Wenz (an excellent book btw), he says:
"Another phrase I promise you will not find in this book is a
Jochem:
Foo, Bar & Qux are used all over the place in IT in the same way
'Person A' and 'Person B' might be used when talking about marketing
demographics theory.
they are shortcuts to avoid having to think up realworld examples,
why would we want to do that?
1. real world examples are full of
Anthony, Tedd,
you now grok the property overloading functionality of php5?
also the bug mentioned by M.Sokolewicz should be fixed in the latest
versions (can't remember exactly which one)
--
Foo, Bar & Qux are used all over the place in IT in the same way
'Person A' and 'Person B' migh
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
private $foo; cannot be accessed directly outside the script.
print $f->foo; #fails
Fatal error: Cannot access private property Foo::$foo in
/x/home/username/docs/misc/php/client.php on line 11
Did you define the __get and __set functions in your class as in the
prev
On 3/28/06, M. Sokolewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> > On 3/28/06, Joe Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Tuesday 28 March 2006 1:12 pm, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >>
> >>> >>>
> >>>class Foo
> >>>{
> >>> private $foo = 'foo';
> >>>
> >>> function __get($k)
[snip]
That's interesting -- not meaning any disrespect, and this is just an
opinion -- but in the newly published "PHP Phrasebook" by Christian
Wenz (an excellent book btw), he says:
"Another phrase I promise you will not find in this book is anything
that looks like foo, bar, baz, or any othe
I am always using 'foo' in conversation and finally said it enough that
the CEO used it in a meeting the other day. Setter functions are cool.
That's interesting -- not meaning any disrespect, and this is just an
opinion -- but in the newly published "PHP Phrasebook" by Christian
Wenz (an exce
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
On 3/28/06, Joe Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 1:12 pm, Jochem Maas wrote:
{$k})) {
return $this->{$k};
}
throw new Exception("non existing property!");
}
function __set($k, $v)
On 3/28/06, Joe Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 March 2006 1:12 pm, Jochem Maas wrote:
> > >
> > class Foo
> > {
> > private $foo = 'foo';
> >
> > function __get($k)
> > {
> > if (isset($this->{$k})) {
> > return $this->{$k};
>
On 3/28/06, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> > On 3/28/06, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>[snip]
> >>I see this all over the place, but I don't think it stores the variable
> >>in =
> >>$foo:
> >>
> >>class Foo {
> >>private $foo;
> >>
> >>public
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 1:12 pm, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
> class Foo
> {
> private $foo = 'foo';
>
> function __get($k)
> {
> if (isset($this->{$k})) {
> return $this->{$k};
> }
>
> throw new Exception("non existing pr
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
On 3/28/06, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I see this all over the place, but I don't think it stores the variable
in =
$foo:
class Foo {
private $foo;
public function __setFoo($arg)
{
$this->foo = $arg;
}
[/snip]
I am always using 'foo' in conversat
On 3/28/06, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> I see this all over the place, but I don't think it stores the variable
> in =
> $foo:
>
> class Foo {
> private $foo;
>
> public function __setFoo($arg)
> {
> $this->foo = $arg;
> }
> [/snip]
>
> I am always using 'foo' in conversat
[snip]
I see this all over the place, but I don't think it stores the variable
in =
$foo:
class Foo {
private $foo;
public function __setFoo($arg)
{
$this->foo = $arg;
}
[/snip]
I am always using 'foo' in conversation and finally said it enough that
the CEO used it in a meeting the other day.
31 matches
Mail list logo
