> As to which is faster is does not really matter as the speed of echo
> print and heredoc is dictated by the connection speed to the
> requesting client. If this is a factor in your overall operation you
> can use output buffering to save the contents and output them at the end of
> your script.
Hi,
Monday, July 7, 2003, 11:33:38 PM, you wrote:
SK> Hi, again!!
SK> I'm looking for opinions as to which is better/faster, print or heredoc.
SK> print makes the code layout look nice and eazy to debug, where heredoc IS faster
but makes the code look like a nightmare with everything jammed aga
> Hi, again!!
I thought I saw this post once already.
> I'm looking for opinions as to which is better/faster, print or heredoc.
Well, like the guy said before, it sounds like you've
pretty much already made up your mind.
I don't use heredocs everywhere, but when I have a fairly large block of
One way to get around having to edit backslashes is to echo using single
quotes. For example:
echo '' . $variable .
'';
-Original Message-
From: Greg Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Sparky Kopetzky
Cc: PHP General
Subject
> I'm looking for opinions as to which is better, print or heredoc.
I prefer heredoc mostly because I do not enjoy editing html that is full of
backslashes. I build up the html and only output anything at the end. This
allows for custom compression, whitespace stripping, etc.
> print makes t
5 matches
Mail list logo
