You can use the symfony. It's a great framework.
Bye.
Augusto Morais
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 00:02 +0200, jfma...@electrex.pt wrote:
> Greetings all!
>
> I new in template engines and frameworks, can you advice me the best php
> framework. Do you all use smarty? I need something that does MVC and
> templates, and specialy that has a lot of web resources to see other
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:25 AM, paragasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> honestly, i never used any framework to do my coding.
> i look into few popular framework like cakePHP and codeIgiter.
> I did learn the tutorial but still decide whether to use it on my next
> project.
>
[snip!]
>
> i just
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 20:49 +0800, paragasu wrote:
> > You get two kinds of framework in PHP IMHO - the Glue frameworks (like
> > Chisimba, CakePHP etc) and the component frameworks (like PEAR, Zend
> > Framework etc).
> >
>
> personally i prefer to call "component framework" as "code library" =)
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 14:41 +0200, Paul Scott wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 13:34 +0100, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > Absolutely. Personally I use a lot of disparate libraries, a lot of them
> > from PEAR. Doing this I've never found the need or the inclination to
> > use a "framework".
> >
>
> B
> You get two kinds of framework in PHP IMHO - the Glue frameworks (like
> Chisimba, CakePHP etc) and the component frameworks (like PEAR, Zend
> Framework etc).
>
personally i prefer to call "component framework" as "code library" =)
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 13:34 +0100, Richard Heyes wrote:
> Absolutely. Personally I use a lot of disparate libraries, a lot of them
> from PEAR. Doing this I've never found the need or the inclination to
> use a "framework".
>
But that is kind of a framework!
You get two kinds of framework in
i just wondering whether i am the only one thinking this way.
anyone out there still doing php without using framework?
Absolutely. Personally I use a lot of disparate libraries, a lot of them
from PEAR. Doing this I've never found the need or the inclination to
use a "framework".
--
Richard
At 5:25 PM +0800 4/22/08, paragasu wrote:
i just wondering whether i am the only one thinking this way.
anyone out there still doing php without using framework?
I don't use a framework either. However, I do have a collection of
routines (many stolen from Rob, David et al on this list) that I
Robert Cummings wrote:
i just wondering whether i am the only one thinking this way.
anyone out there still doing php without using framework?
There's plenty of people out there who don't believe in frameworks.
Nothing wrong with that-- to each their own. Only thing I would ask you
is whether y
> My clients benefit downstream whenever I add to my framework. A problem
> solved two years ago is a problem still solved today, and I don't need
> to copy and paste into their project and thus maintain multiple versions
> of the same solution.
i am quite new in php. i only spent about 3 year pl
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:25 +0800, paragasu wrote:
> honestly, i never used any framework to do my coding.
> i look into few popular framework like cakePHP and codeIgiter.
> I did learn the tutorial but still decide whether to use it on my next
> project.
>
> the thing is, i already develop few w
Umm hell yes?
I don't use frameworks, its an awsome thing, but I don't like them.
But if I'm not using any framework at all, the least I do is writing the
application object-oriented'ly.
Regards,
Nitsan
On 22/04/2008, paragasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> honestly, i never used any framework to
I second that, and if anyone in the know cares to comment on whether:
a. php will actually implement static late binding
Mike Lively gives and update on the late static binding patch submitted
to the internals on his blog
http://www.digitalsandwich.com/archives/53-Late-Static-Binding-in-PH
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 19:23, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
I must say that I have questions regarding the 'real' reasons behind
The most plausible real reason is to give Zend's name to a framework
that will possibly rally interest behind a single framework
Chris Shiflett wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
a. php will actually implement static late binding
b. Zend Framework's 'DataObject' class will make use of said late
binding to do cool things like Person::findAll( $myFilter ) with
out having to actually implement a findAll method in the Person
class
Jochem Maas wrote:
a. php will actually implement static late binding
b. Zend Framework's 'DataObject' class will make use of said late
binding to do cool things like Person::findAll( $myFilter ) with
out having to actually implement a findAll method in the Person
class
I have read indications
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 19:23, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> I must say that I have questions regarding the 'real' reasons behind
The most plausible real reason is to give Zend's name to a framework
that will possibly rally interest behind a single framework rather than
the multitu
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 16:21, Jochem Maas wrote:
no question here but for anyone wanting a totally different take
on php frameworks and some killer code examples
take a look at this:
http://toys.lerdorf.com/archives/38-The-no-framework-PHP-MVC-framework.html
Rasmu
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 16:21, Jochem Maas wrote:
> no question here but for anyone wanting a totally different take
> on php frameworks and some killer code examples
>
> take a look at this:
> http://toys.lerdorf.com/archives/38-The-no-framework-PHP-MVC-framework.html
Rasmus is just suggestin
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 16:09, Richard Davey wrote:
> > I want to start using a framework to my future sites and I saw that
> > there are quite alot of options out there at the net, if anyone got
> > any experience with frameworks I would really like to receive some
> > suggestions, recommendit
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 09:54, Yonatan Ben-Nes wrote:
Hi All,
I want to start using a framework to my future sites and I saw that
there are quite alot of options out there at the net, if anyone got any
experience with frameworks I would really like to receive some
sugge
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 09:54, Yonatan Ben-Nes wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to start using a framework to my future sites and I saw that
> there are quite alot of options out there at the net, if anyone got any
> experience with frameworks I would really like to receive some
> suggestions, recomme
Richard Davey wrote:
Hi Yonatan,
Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 2:54:27 PM, you wrote:
I want to start using a framework to my future sites and I saw that
there are quite alot of options out there at the net, if anyone got
any experience with frameworks I would really like to receive some
sugges
Hi Yonatan,
Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 2:54:27 PM, you wrote:
> I want to start using a framework to my future sites and I saw that
> there are quite alot of options out there at the net, if anyone got
> any experience with frameworks I would really like to receive some
> suggestions, recommendi
On 24/10/2004, at 4:04 AM, Igor wrote:
I need to develop an PHP/MySql application (about 20 db tables and 70
screens). I was wandering if there is a solid framework out there that
could help development. Also, I would appreciate any recommendations
for books/docs on good development practices an
Igor,
the problem on using a framework is that you have to learn it before
you take advantage of its features, I mean you must consider the
learning curve in your time schedule.
There are pretty good frameworks out there, but each one with your pros
and cons, and with your own goals, I mean, a s
Modified to be object oriented and support xml/xslt.
Jordan S. Jones wrote:
Where I work, we use a heavily modified version of Fusebox. We like it.
Jordan S. Jones
Lai, Kenny wrote:
just wanted a general idea on what kind of PHP framework everyone is
using..
i've heard of pear, and interjinn
Where I work, we use a heavily modified version of Fusebox. We like it.
Jordan S. Jones
Lai, Kenny wrote:
just wanted a general idea on what kind of PHP framework everyone is using..
i've heard of pear, and interjinn.. is there a preference or distinct
advantage that a particular framework has
> just wanted a general idea on what kind of PHP framework everyone is using..
> i've heard of pear, and interjinn.. is there a preference or distinct
> advantage that a particular framework has in comparison to one another?
Check the archives...this has been touched on numerous times in the past
"Maxim Maletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> I agree, I'd go for Smarty. Though, on the other hand, I often see no
> reason for using the Templates of any kind. Why? Because you stil get to
> hard code the tags in it. Not making that much se
to real PHP code - that's what makes it so fast. It's also very
> easy to extend.
>
> Danny.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Wards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, Feb
How does Smarty compare with PHP FAST Template??
- Original Message -
From: "Danny Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Framework
> Well, Yahoo! have moved/are moving to Smarty a
-
From: "John Wards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Framework
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 2:01 pm, karthikeyan.balasubramanian wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I finally decided to upgrade my PHP. Just want t
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 2:01 pm, karthikeyan.balasubramanian wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I finally decided to upgrade my PHP. Just want to know your thoughts on
> which Framework is the best with a clear seperation of content from
> presentation.
>
> Please let me know which do you think is the best an
35 matches
Mail list logo
