good point, gabriel.
i really need to stop procrastinating with the whole memcache project.
perhaps i ought to postpone consideration of the session handler until i've
learned something about memcache, which i need to do anyway.
On 9/8/09 10:06 PM, "Gabriel Sosa" wrote:
> I'm our case we opt f
On 9/9/09 4:16 AM, "Ford, Mike" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom Worster [mailto:f...@thefsb.org]
>> Sent: 09 September 2009 02:29
>>
>> thanks, Devendra, that's pretty much the same as my handler. (though
>> i can't
>> figure Rich Smith's $sess_save_path global. do you know wha
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Worster [mailto:f...@thefsb.org]
> Sent: 09 September 2009 02:29
>
> thanks, Devendra, that's pretty much the same as my handler. (though
> i can't
> figure Rich Smith's $sess_save_path global. do you know what is
> for?)
I think if you look at the comment
I'm our case we opt for memcache to store the sessions
Mmc its soo much faster and you will have less net overhead because
the simple protocol
Also the configuration its easier. If you see in the php manual you
only need to touch two lines in the php.ini
On 9/8/09, Tom Worster wrote:
> thanks, De
thanks, Devendra, that's pretty much the same as my handler. (though i can't
figure Rich Smith's $sess_save_path global. do you know what is for?)
but what i'm really interested in is people's experience in switching over
to and using this kind of handler: pitfalls, gotchas, etc. or is it really
a
http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/Storing-PHP-Sessions-in-a-Database/
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> questions for those of you with a user session handler using mysql:
>
> did you write your own handler, write one based off some other you found
> (if
> so, which?), or are y
6 matches
Mail list logo
