Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Stephen
I have been reading this thread with interest ... and amusement. FWII for my web sites I have 1) Most PHP code in files outside of the document root 2) Site specific variables (constants, really) in an include.php file 3) All HTML is also in this include file and is the content a variable. 4) Ne

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Sancar Saran
On Friday 06 February 2009 19:12:08 Frank Stanovcak wrote: > I'm in the process of seperating logic from display in a section of code, > and wanted to make sure I wasn't treading on a performance landmine here, > so I ask you wizened masters of the dark arts this... > > is there a serious performan

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Daevid Vincent
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:32 +, Stuart wrote: > They're called short tags, not fast tags. There is nothing faster > about them beyond the typing effort required. Mostly true. However, the only thing that does is an "echo/print", so aside from saving you all the time, you can't do Person

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Frank Stanovcak
"Stuart" wrote in message news:a5f019de0902060932k1ccf2948ua42f3cfa33694...@mail.gmail.com... > 2009/2/6 Frank Stanovcak : >> >> "Richard Heyes" wrote in message >> news:af8726440902060918v6d2f1ee1ia3f839189874...@mail.gmail.com... Wouldn't have thought so. But for readability, you may fin

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Paul M Foster
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:09:13PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bruno Fajardo wrote: > > In my opinion, you would achieve better results using a template > > engine, like Smarty (http://www.smarty.net/). In addition, your code > > would be entirely separated from p

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Eric Butera
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Bruno Fajardo wrote: > I am so stick to Smarty that I never tried other solutions, like > Savant. Thanks for the tip, I'll try it right away. > > Cheers. > > 2009/2/6 Eric Butera : >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bruno Fajardo wrote: >>> Well, Smarty's caching l

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Bruno Fajardo
I am so stick to Smarty that I never tried other solutions, like Savant. Thanks for the tip, I'll try it right away. Cheers. 2009/2/6 Eric Butera : > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bruno Fajardo wrote: >> Well, Smarty's caching layer is very fast. Maybe not as fast as an >> echo statement, but

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Eric Butera
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bruno Fajardo wrote: > Well, Smarty's caching layer is very fast. Maybe not as fast as an > echo statement, but apparentely Frank was also interested in separate > logic from presentation, and a series of echo's is not the best > solution in my opinion. :-) > But th

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Bruno Fajardo
Well, Smarty's caching layer is very fast. Maybe not as fast as an echo statement, but apparentely Frank was also interested in separate logic from presentation, and a series of echo's is not the best solution in my opinion. :-) But the best solution depends of the context of the application, i agr

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Eric Butera
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bruno Fajardo wrote: > In my opinion, you would achieve better results using a template > engine, like Smarty (http://www.smarty.net/). In addition, your code > would be entirely separated from presentation in a elegant way. > > 2009/2/6 Frank Stanovcak : >> I'm in

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Stuart
2009/2/6 Frank Stanovcak : > > "Richard Heyes" wrote in message > news:af8726440902060918v6d2f1ee1ia3f839189874...@mail.gmail.com... >>> Wouldn't have thought so. But for readability, you may find this a >>> little easier instead: >> >> Slight correction: >> >> ?> >> blah >> > >> -- >> Richar

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Frank Stanovcak
"Bruno Fajardo" wrote in message news:eeb6980b0902060915k2b34ec31nc6ad166e2c544...@mail.gmail.com... In my opinion, you would achieve better results using a template engine, like Smarty (http://www.smarty.net/). In addition, your code would be entirely separated from presentation in a elegant wa

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Frank Stanovcak
"Richard Heyes" wrote in message news:af8726440902060918v6d2f1ee1ia3f839189874...@mail.gmail.com... >> Wouldn't have thought so. But for readability, you may find this a >> little easier instead: > > Slight correction: > > ?> > blah > > -- > Richard Heyes > > HTML5 Canvas graphing for Fir

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Richard Heyes
> Wouldn't have thought so. But for readability, you may find this a > little easier instead: Slight correction: ?> blah http://www.rgraph.org (Updated January 31st) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Bruno Fajardo
In my opinion, you would achieve better results using a template engine, like Smarty (http://www.smarty.net/). In addition, your code would be entirely separated from presentation in a elegant way. 2009/2/6 Frank Stanovcak : > I'm in the process of seperating logic from display in a section of cod

Re: [PHP] long echo statement performance question

2009-02-06 Thread Richard Heyes
> ... Wouldn't have thought so. But for readability, you may find this a little easier instead: ?> {$var1} Blah {$var2} ... http://www.rgraph.org (Updated January 31st) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php