As has been said: It all depends on the developer. A skilled developer
is not restrained by how "secure" the particular language is. A
skilled developer will know the pitfalls of that language, and be able
to avoid them.
With php as an example, you have register_globals. Now,
register_globals is
Well, if you do not know the answer to my particular question, I'm
curious how might you respond to someone who says:
PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
user authentication system.
We should use XXX.
I think security mainly depends on the programmer and no
On Thu, February 1, 2007 9:19 am, Eric Gorr wrote:
> Well, if you do not know the answer to my particular question, I'm
> curious how might you respond to someone who says:
>
> PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
> user authentication system.
> We should use XX
Eric Gorr wrote:
PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
user authentication system.
We should use XXX.
Well, people's complaints about PHP probably stem from some security
pitfalls built-in for simplicity's sake. (The most common being
register_globals.) For th
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 10:19 -0500, Eric Gorr wrote:
>
> Well, if you do not know the answer to my particular question, I'm
> curious how might you respond to someone who says:
>
> PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
> user authentication system.
> We shoul
On cs, 2007-02-01 at 10:19 -0500, Eric Gorr wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
> > Eric Gorr wrote:
> >>
> >> On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >>
> >>> Eric Gorr wrote:
> I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more
> insecure then
>
On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:
I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more
insecure then
other methods of developing website where security was of prime
importance. Now, I perso
Eric Gorr wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
>> Eric Gorr wrote:
>>> I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure then
>>> other methods of developing website where security was of prime
>>> importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it wo
On 2/1/07, Eric Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
>
> Also, check out
> http://www.shiflett.org as Chris is one of if not the leading
> expert in
> security with PHP.
Great site. thank you.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To uns
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
Also, check out
http://www.shiflett.org as Chris is one of if not the leading
expert in
security with PHP.
Great site. thank you.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:
I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure
then
other methods of developing website where security was of prime
importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would
help me
to convince others
[snip]
I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure
then other methods of developing website where security was of prime
importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would help
me to convince others if I could point to major sites, where security
(mostly wi
Eric Gorr wrote:
> I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure then
> other methods of developing website where security was of prime
> importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would help me
> to convince others if I could point to major sites, where security
13 matches
Mail list logo
