tedd wrote:
[agree with all of the above]
> So in Switzerland if each of you have a ID card, then the problem is
> "solved" as descried above. However, if there is no ID card, then
> other methods must be considered.
It's not the ID-card as such (it's your ability to prove your own
identity), b
At 1:19 PM +0100 2/21/09, Per Jessen wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Not at all - you issue voting-rights based on user identity.
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
> person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
>
> anything else is going to be flawed
Not at all - you issue voting-rights based on user identity. Works very
well in many places. Here in S
At 11:09 PM + 2/20/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Hey now, what do you have agains
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Hey now, what do you have against us clones?
;)
and nobody noticed I said D
Nathan Rixham wrote:
it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per
person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user.
anything else is going to be flawed
Hey now, what do you have against us clones?
;)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To u
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Ashley Sheridan napsal(a):
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Ashley Sheridan napsal(a):
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
> Chris napsal(a):
> > Martin Zvarík wrote:
> >> Chris napsal(a):
> >>> Martin Zvarík wrote:
> tedd napsal(a):
> > At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
> >> tedd napsal(a):
> >>> At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvar
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you nee
Chris napsal(a):
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if I would I would not vo
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need
to input your email address - and if I would
I would not vote - because it'
tedd napsal(a):
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if I would I would not vote - because it's a waste of
my time... if you want me to vote y
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to
input your email address - and if I would I
would not vote - because it's a waste of my
time... if you want me to vote you do
everythin
tedd napsal(a):
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email
address - and if I would I would not vote - because it's a waste of
my time... if you want me to vote you do everything you can to make
it as pleasant as possible -- c
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to
input your email address - and if I would I
would not vote - because it's a waste of my
time... if you want me to vote you do everything
you can to make it as pleasant as possible --
certainly that i
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email address
- and if I would I would not vote - because it's a waste of my time...
if you want me to vote you do everything you can to make it as pleasant
as possible -- certainly that isn't requirement of an email validation.
Andre
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:07 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 3:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
>>
>> You're missing my point. Yes, e-mail addresses are unique delivery
>> points. They can not, however, uniquely identify one and only one
>> person -- which is what one would need in the OP's situati
At 3:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
You're missing my point. Yes, e-mail addresses are unique delivery
points. They can not, however, uniquely identify one and only one
person -- which is what one would need in the OP's situation.
Andrew
Andrew:
No -- I did not miss you point, you
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:54 -0500, Andrew Ballard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM, tedd wrote:
> > At 1:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd wrote:
> >>
> >> > Granted this is an involved method, but email addresses are unique and
>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 1:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd wrote:
>>
>> > Granted this is an involved method, but email addresses are unique and
>> thus
>>>
>>> ensures one vote per email address.
>>
>> E-mail addre
At 1:54 PM -0500 2/18/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd wrote:
> Granted this is an involved method, but email addresses are unique and thus
ensures one vote per email address.
E-mail addresses are (somewhat unique -- not getting into aliases,
forwards, and su
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 5:47 AM +0200 2/18/09, Ian wrote:
>>
>> Anyone had to deal with this in the past and does anyone have any
>> suggestions/ideas as to how I could better this setup?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>> Ian
>
> Ian:
>
> As other people have said, using I
At 5:47 AM +0200 2/18/09, Ian wrote:
Anyone had to deal with this in the past and does anyone have any
suggestions/ideas as to how I could better this setup?
Many thanks in advance,
Ian
Ian:
As other people have said, using IP's are not really a good solution.
If it was me, I would ask the u
We dont have registration - its a once off vote anonymously using the hash
in the original email. We dont want registration otherwise it would be much
easier - but this was the best way I could think of without user
registration :/
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Chris wrote:
> Ian wrote:
>
>>
Ian wrote:
Hi,
Yep it is backed by DB and i do record when they vote - but its still
flawed in how to track unique users :) Thanks though - will continue to
look further.
Do you have to log in to vote?
How are you stopping people from signing up multiple times?
--
Postgresql & php tutorial
Hi,
Yep it is backed by DB and i do record when they vote - but its still flawed
in how to track unique users :) Thanks though - will continue to look
further.
Cheers
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chris wrote:
> Ian wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am busy building an application that requires one time
Ian wrote:
Hi,
I am busy building an application that requires one time voting and to get
around the user deleting a cookie that I set im keeping a hash on my side
which I then try match before allowing anything.
I assume this is backed by a db of some sort.
$query = "update user set has_vote
31 matches
Mail list logo
