On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:47:41 +0800, Jason Wong wrote:
>On Wednesday 26 February 2003 16:49, {R}ichard Ashton wrote:
>
>> Do you think that:
>>
>> if (preg_match($re, $posting, $hits)) would slow it down at all. The
>> $buzzwords will be kept in a file to be loaded before each run, every 5
>> minute
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 16:49, {R}ichard Ashton wrote:
> Do you think that:
>
> if (preg_match($re, $posting, $hits)) would slow it down at all. The
> $buzzwords will be kept in a file to be loaded before each run, every 5
> minutes. I could therefore keep a count of which words hit most
> f
At 09:49 26.02.2003, {R}ichard Ashton said:
[snip]
>Do you think that:
>
>if (preg_match($re, $posting, $hits)) would slow it down at all. The
>$buzzwords will be kept in a file to be loaded before each run, every 5
>minutes. I could therefore keep a count of
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:35:35 +0100, Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
>At 21:22 24.02.2003, {R}ichard Ashton spoke out and said:
>[snip]
>>while ( $flag == true )
>>if (strpos($body, $word[]) > 0) {$flag=false}
>>
>>What I really need to know is which is the faste
At 21:22 24.02.2003, {R}ichard Ashton spoke out and said:
[snip]
>while ( $flag == true )
>if (strpos($body, $word[]) > 0) {$flag=false}
>
>What I really need to know is which is the fastest loop?
>Which is the fastest match, strpos?
>Which is the fastest com
5 matches
Mail list logo