k...@bitflop.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:25:57 -0600
Donovan Brooke wrote:
and btw, I found that Billy Hoffman article
to be inaccurate in many of his assertions.
Would you mind sharing in what ways you found his assertions inaccurate?
Kind regards,
Kim
Cheers,
Donovan
--
D Brooke
On 29 December 2010 16:34, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 28 December 2010 17:18, wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I am currently looking into improving a system that (like many systems)
>> generate static content at runtime.
>>
>> I have always been against generating static content at runtime and
>> believe
On 28 December 2010 17:18, wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am currently looking into improving a system that (like many systems)
> generate static content at runtime.
>
> I have always been against generating static content at runtime and
> believe static content should be generated by a cronjob or manually a
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:25:57 -0600
Donovan Brooke wrote:
> and btw, I found that Billy Hoffman article
> to be inaccurate in many of his assertions.
Would you mind sharing in what ways you found his assertions inaccurate?
Kind regards,
Kim
> Cheers,
> Donovan
>
> --
> D Brooke
>
> --
> PH
k...@bitflop.com wrote:
Hi.
I am currently looking into improving a system that (like many systems)
generate static content at runtime.
I have always been against generating static content at runtime and
believe static content should be generated by a cronjob or manually at
some idle time (if p
On 2010-12-28, at 2:19 PM, David Harkness wrote:
> The other option is to generate the page dynamically and cache it (we use
> Varnish) for the next users. This way you pay the cost to regenerate pages
> only for those someone views--and only once. This pays off well when you
> have high traffi
The other option is to generate the page dynamically and cache it (we use
Varnish) for the next users. This way you pay the cost to regenerate pages
only for those someone views--and only once. This pays off well when you
have high traffic.
David
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:25 -0500, Govinda wrote:
> >
> > Care to share your experiences and recommendations on the issue?
> >
>
>
> It seems to me that you ask a great question, and ask it well.
>
> I have worked on both kinds of systems. But I am not expert enough to
> say anything definit
Care to share your experiences and recommendations on the issue?
It seems to me that you ask a great question, and ask it well.
I have worked on both kinds of systems. But I am not expert enough to
say anything definitively. Just one thought I had while thinking
about it:
How about:
9 matches
Mail list logo