So sprach »Aral Balkan« am 2001-07-11 um 14:59:44 -0400 :
> Personally, I couldn't be happier that Netscape won't be making browsers
Ah, so Microsoft also stopped making "operating systems"?
> anymore and I wish that trouble-some bug of an excuse for a browser would
> just go away :)
Well, Nets
>> Netscape is notoriously slug-like when it comes to loading large tables
(i.e. the output of phpinfo()).
A way around this is to break up large tables into numerous smaller ones (or
at least have one table at the top that displays something so that the user
doesn't think that things have gone a
age-
> From: Inércia Sensorial [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Speed of loding PHP pages
>
>
>
> No. It also depends on the internal engine used by the browser to
> 'contruct' the elements. On Windows plataforms, Netscape are slower to
> render
No. It also depends on the internal engine used by the browser to
'contruct' the elements. On Windows plataforms, Netscape are slower to
render cached pages. But IE has an advantage, it is built around some native
windows functionalities, one of the reasons it is faster. I don't know for
other
Are IE and Netscape both set the same as far as caching?
-
Brian S. Dunworth
Sr. Software Development Engineer
Oracle Database Administrator
The Printing House, Ltd.
(850) 875-1500 x225
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don wrote:
> Has anyone tries any test loading PHP pages into IE 5.x and Netscape
> 4.7x?
This is in no way related to PHP.
It's just the old Netscape taking lots of time for +rendering large
pages, especially with nested tables.
regards
Wagner
--
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact cha
Netscape is notoriously slug-like when it comes to loading large tables
(i.e. the output of phpinfo()).
- Tim
> As an experiment, I have a page that issues a phpinfo(). WIth I.E. 5.5,
> it takes about 3 seconds. With Netscape 4.77, it takes almost 20
> seconds.
--
PHP General Mailing List
7 matches
Mail list logo
