On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:56:59 +0100, Marek Kilimajer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code misses one important thing - row locking. For concurent
> requests, sess_open must block until the first request does
> sess_close(). So you need to use InnoDB's row locking or
> application-level GET_LOCK() a
Greg Donald wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:36:26 -0800 (PST), Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It's literally an hour's work to alter the code to use MySQL to store the
sessions instead of the hard drive.
Not really, maybe 5 minutes.. here's the code:
The code misses one important thing -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 16 Feb 2005 Richard Lynch wrote:
>
>> Use the exact same session stuff you have now and just dump the
>> serialized data into SQL using the 5 functions for session handling.
>
> Oh, OK, that's what you meant about the 5 functions. I am not sure of
> the advantage to t
On 16 Feb 2005 Richard Lynch wrote:
> Use the exact same session stuff you have now and just dump the
> serialized data into SQL using the 5 functions for session handling.
Oh, OK, that's what you meant about the 5 functions. I am not sure of
the advantage to that, actually something I've alwa
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:36:26 -0800 (PST), Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It's literally an hour's work to alter the code to use MySQL to store the
> sessions instead of the hard drive.
Not really, maybe 5 minutes.. here's the code:
Make the table in your database:
CREATE TABLE `sess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2005 Richard Lynch wrote:
>
>> Throw an ab (Apache Benchmark) test at it and find out.
>>
>> Don't just guess or sit there wondering.
>>
>> You could run test in about the time it took to compose this email --
>
> Perhaps if you are already familiar with ab, whi
On 15 Feb 2005 Greg Donald wrote:
> > If you have to choose between a meaningful variable name and performance
> > considerations, buy more hardware! :-)
> >
> > The cost you'll save in the long run for code maintenance will make it
> > worth it.
>
> Comments in the code make using short session
On 15 Feb 2005 Richard Lynch wrote:
> Throw an ab (Apache Benchmark) test at it and find out.
>
> Don't just guess or sit there wondering.
>
> You could run test in about the time it took to compose this email --
Perhaps if you are already familiar with ab, which I'm not ... and if
the server
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:01:45 -0800 (PST), Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you have to choose between a meaningful variable name and performance
> considerations, buy more hardware! :-)
>
> The cost you'll save in the long run for code maintenance will make it
> worth it.
Comments i
Greg Donald wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:03:10 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have a multi-page form which I build up and store in session
>> variables. The data saved includes all an internal list of items on
>> the form (derived from a database table), all the form
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:03:10 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a multi-page form which I build up and store in session
> variables. The data saved includes all an internal list of items on
> the form (derived from a database table), all the form field specs
> (derived fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a multi-page form which I build up and store in session
variables. The data saved includes all an internal list of items on
the form (derived from a database table), all the form field specs
(derived from the internal item list), the data for the fields (from
an
12 matches
Mail list logo
