http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.search.lucene.html
Nice one, thanks.
--
Richard Heyes
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I've been playing around with the zend search lucene and it is really
>> powerful too.
>
> Worth looking into?
>
> --
> Richard Heyes
Most definitely. But with all that power and optional stuff comes
complexity t
Hi,
I've been playing around with the zend search lucene and it is really
powerful too.
Worth looking into?
--
Richard Heyes
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> the entire King James Bible in a dB -- interesting read
That's debateable... :-)
--
Richard Heyes
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:40 PM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1:56 PM -0400 7/19/08, Eric Butera wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ever play with fulltext search?
>
>
> Never in public. :-)
>
> You could throw all text into your database and then do a fulltext search to
> give back the related pages -- that
At 1:56 PM -0400 7/19/08, Eric Butera wrote:
Ever play with fulltext search?
Never in public. :-)
You could throw all text into your database and then do a fulltext
search to give back the related pages -- that would work. I think I
saw that as an example in one of the books I read. PHP C
Ever play with fulltext search?
Yes, though it's not suitable in this instance.
--
Richard Heyes
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was hoping to get some ideas on improving a sites search. Currently I have
> two - not a lot but I've been thinking about this for a few minutes.
>
> Currently the site in question uses a very basic LIKE in MySQL
Hi.
Just noticed I replied direct rather than to the list last time, sorry
about that.
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Richard Heyes wrote:
> How much traffic do you have and what's your hardware? Are your queries
> cached and subsequently repeated? Do you pre cache common queries?
I've done this kin
I'm sure that would work, but just how many LIKE items do you want to
show the user? For me, I would rather not show them anything if there is
nothing on my site that matches their exact search criteria.
Certainly an idea, but something like "We also found..." might be
helpful in regard to typ
At 10:47 AM +0100 7/19/08, Richard Heyes wrote:
Hey,
I was hoping to get some ideas on improving a sites search.
Currently I have two - not a lot but I've been thinking about this
for a few minutes.
That'll leave a mark. :-)
Currently the site in question uses a very basic LIKE in MySQL, eg
Mark Kelly wrote:
Hi.
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Richard Heyes wrote:
Currently the site in question uses a very basic LIKE in MySQL, eg
%blah%, but naturally this finds terms such as hjkblahbjkk - which is
not desired. Or such matches should be ranked lower than something that
matches the exact
12 matches
Mail list logo
