>
> PS
> I never have figured out why one would want to
> notify a zillion
> strangers that you're on vacation...
>
> I mean, duh, talk about a security risk...
>
> "Hey, stranger, I'm on vacation!!! Nice big house
> of computer geek
> full of stuff sitting unwatched!!!"
>
> I'm really not su
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
gmail seems to consume these 'double replies' transparently w/ its
'conversations'.
i never notice them :)
sorry to everyone who gets hit w/ the extra mail when i hit reply-to-all.
youll have to forgive my laziness, its just easier that way.
Interestingly your reply is du
gmail seems to consume these 'double replies' transparently w/ its
'conversations'.
i never notice them :)
sorry to everyone who gets hit w/ the extra mail when i hit reply-to-all.
youll have to forgive my laziness, its just easier that way.
-nathan
On 7/29/07, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Brown wrote:
As a relatively-new contributor to this list (read: under 2
years), I realize that I have no business requesting a change, but
I'll breech etiquette and hope for the best.
Can we update the filters on the list to have the reply-to address
header marked to the php-gene
On Sat, July 28, 2007 11:37 pm, Larry Garfield wrote:
> Amen! A public discussion list (such as this one) really should have
> Reply-To
> set correctly. All of the arguments against Reply-To headers apply
> only to
> the 1% of the population still using mail clients written in the early
> 90s.
On Sat, July 28, 2007 7:28 pm, Daniel Brown wrote:
> Can we update the filters on the list to have the reply-to address
> header marked to the php-general address?
This is a religious question of mailing list management, and there are
always going to be large sized contingents on each side of
On Saturday 28 July 2007, Daniel Brown wrote:
> As a relatively-new contributor to this list (read: under 2
> years), I realize that I have no business requesting a change, but
> I'll breech etiquette and hope for the best.
>
> Can we update the filters on the list to have the reply-to addr
On 7/29/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As a relatively-new contributor to this list (read: under 2
> years), I realize that I have no business requesting a change, but
> I'll breech etiquette and hope for the best.
>
>Can we update the filters on the list to have the reply-to
8 matches
Mail list logo
