At 8:03 PM +0100 11/21/07, Jochem Maas wrote:
tedd wrote:
> Well, I wasn't able to get it to work -- I couldn't find where to change
the FF settings (Mac).
type 'about:config' into the address bar :-)
I know I'll get a big argument from all of you about this, but
sometimes I can be pretty
Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> huh? if I post a file to a script that returns a 204 status and nothing
> else then the page should not change in the browser.
> [/snip]
>
> True, the missing piece is that the post cannot move the file up to the
> server.
I was referring to a standard POST not us
tedd wrote:
> At 12:23 PM -0600 11/21/07, Jay Blanchard wrote:
>> [snip]
>> But, take a look at this:
>>
>> http://www.captain.at/ajax-file-upload.php
>>
>> They look like their blowing the same wind.
>> [/snip]
>>
>> Yep, look at all of the gotchas.
>
>
> Well, I wasn't able to get it to work --
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 3:24 PM
> To: tedd; Jochem Maas
> Cc: Colin Guthrie; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: uploading files... necessary Ajax?
>
> [snip]
&g
At 12:23 PM -0600 11/21/07, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
But, take a look at this:
http://www.captain.at/ajax-file-upload.php
They look like their blowing the same wind.
[/snip]
Yep, look at all of the gotchas.
Well, I wasn't able to get it to work -- I couldn't find where to
change the FF
[snip]
But, take a look at this:
http://www.captain.at/ajax-file-upload.php
They look like their blowing the same wind.
[/snip]
Yep, look at all of the gotchas.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 11:49 AM -0600 11/21/07, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Ahhh, so that's it.
My twitchy little brain was thinking if I can send arguments to the
server via ajax, then why can't I send ""multipart/form-data"? After
all, data is data right?
It might be too cpu intensive, but I can imagine js break
[snip]
Ahhh, so that's it.
My twitchy little brain was thinking if I can send arguments to the
server via ajax, then why can't I send ""multipart/form-data"? After
all, data is data right?
It might be too cpu intensive, but I can imagine js breaking down an
image file in packets and then sendi
At 11:32 AM -0600 11/21/07, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
huh? if I post a file to a script that returns a 204 status and nothing
else then the page should not change in the browser.
[/snip]
True, the missing piece is that the post cannot move the file up to the
server.
Ahhh, so that's it.
My
[snip]
huh? if I post a file to a script that returns a 204 status and nothing
else then the page should not change in the browser.
[/snip]
True, the missing piece is that the post cannot move the file up to the
server.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: htt
Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> So that I can get my head around this, are all of you saying there is
> no Ajax equivalent of:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We can't in some way use the ajax post method to send the file in the
> background without a refresh (other than using iframe) is that
> correct?
[snip]
That is correct. Without an IFRAME you cannot upload a file without a
refresh.
[/snip]
Take Two. You could also open another window, but that kinda defeats the
purpose.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
iframe or a SWF).
Hope not to be far from thruth
Rob
(sorry, top posting, we've all read the rest of it :D)
> -Original Message-
> From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 2:13 PM
> To: Jochem Maas; Colin Guthrie
> Cc: php-general@li
[snip]
So that I can get my head around this, are all of you saying there is
no Ajax equivalent of:
We can't in some way use the ajax post method to send the file in the
background without a refresh (other than using iframe) is that
correct? Or am I completely missing something here?
[/sn
Hi gang:
So that I can get my head around this, are all of you saying there is
no Ajax equivalent of:
We can't in some way use the ajax post method to send the file in the
background without a refresh (other than using iframe) is that
correct? Or am I completely missing something here?
Colin Guthrie wrote:
> T.Lensselink wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:38:18 -0600, "Jay Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> Seems to me Pere want's to do an upload without reloading the whole
>>> page.
>>> [/snip]
>>>
>>> The problem is that you cannot upload files using Ajax alo
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 11:00 +0200, clive wrote:
> itoctopus wrote:
> > I have tried both, and I tell you that I really felt that the filesystem is
> > a more convenient way of doing it.
> >
> I have to agree, filesystems were after all designed to store files. I
> reckon reading a file from disk
On 5/22/07, clive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
itoctopus wrote:
> I have tried both, and I tell you that I really felt that the filesystem is
> a more convenient way of doing it.
>
I have to agree, filesystems were after all designed to store files. I
reckon reading a file from disk is much quicker
itoctopus wrote:
I have tried both, and I tell you that I really felt that the filesystem is
a more convenient way of doing it.
I have to agree, filesystems were after all designed to store files. I
reckon reading a file from disk is much quicker than reading from a
database, maybe only fract
Thats all fine
Here is my form header
"Kevin Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:020201c281ec$04515820$6601a8c0@;kevin...
> Confirm that you're using the proper header information in your HTML
> tag..
>
> -Kevin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Shaun Thornburgh" <[EMAIL
Possibly. But temp files created during execution should be destroyed when
the script exists. So either copying or moving shouldn't make any
difference. Besides that I think the difference is strictly semantic.
Another possibility is that this is a browser cache issue.
-Kevin
- Original Mes
21 matches
Mail list logo
