Re: [PHP] Re: functions versus includes

2007-11-14 Thread Frank Lopes
<> Stut, You pointed me in the right direction, thank you. "Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Frank Lopes wrote: No takers on this topic? The question is not one of performance since while it will be quicker to call a function than include a file the diffe

Re: [PHP] Re: functions versus includes

2007-11-12 Thread Stut
Frank Lopes wrote: No takers on this topic? The question is not one of performance since while it will be quicker to call a function than include a file the difference is going to be inconsequential. If you were to use a function where would you put it? You imply it needs to be used from m

RE: [PHP] Re: functions versus includes

2007-11-11 Thread Bastien Koert
Wouldn't it be simpler to add some timers in and check for yourself? Bastien > To: php-general@lists.php.net> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:02:58 -0500> Subject: [PHP] Re: functions versus includes>> No takers on this topic?>>> ""F

Re: [PHP] Re: functions versus includes

2007-11-11 Thread Nathan Nobbe
On Nov 11, 2007 6:02 PM, Frank Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No takers on this topic? > > > ""Frank Lopes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I just started using PHP and got to think... > > > > Without getting into the discussion of "best practices", strictly f