"tedd" wrote in message
news:p06240801c5aa0ed7d...@[192.168.1.101]...
> At 4:16 PM +0100 1/30/09, Jochem Maas wrote:
>>tedd schreef:
>>> At 4:43 PM -0500 1/29/09, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>"
yes...that is legal. as long as the statment resolves to a boolean it
will
At 4:16 PM +0100 1/30/09, Jochem Maas wrote:
tedd schreef:
At 4:43 PM -0500 1/29/09, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>"
yes...that is legal. as long as the statment resolves to a boolean it
will
work. It's not technically correct, but it does work.
There you go again. What's technically corr
tedd schreef:
> At 4:43 PM -0500 1/29/09, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>> >"
>>
>> yes...that is legal. as long as the statment resolves to a boolean it
>> will
>> work. It's not technically correct, but it does work.
>
> There you go again. What's technically correct?
hiya tedd,
you mean to ask "n
3 matches
Mail list logo
