On Jan 8, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings
wrote:
...
They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
Tacos?
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
--
PHP General Mailing List (http:
Sorry forgot to mention that we used APC with apc.stat turned off
which will give a little bit more performance gain, but it does mean
flushing the cache on every code push (which is trivial).
Ravi
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, J Ravi Menon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A note on bytecode caching and inc
Hi,
A note on bytecode caching and include/include_once performance. A
while ago when we were profiling our code, we did notice that file
includes do take a noticeable percentage of overall overhead (enough
for us to look into it more deep). We are using apc cache on a
standard LAMP platform (linu
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
http://itst.ne
Graham Cossey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
:)
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Frame
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> ...
> They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
--
Graham
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
>clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
>> Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches.
>> They're an
>> interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
>> http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-th
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-three-opcode-caches-compared correctly they
only double
the average speed of operation, which is
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:20:26 -0500, kolb0...@umn.edu (Daniel Kolbo) wrote:
>Daevid Vincent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:11:07 -0800, dae...@daevid.com ("Daevid Vincent") wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
>
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 04:11, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I think it's a case by case basis. Generally File I/O is expensive, but
> then again, as you say, having everything in a couple files is also
> sub-optimal for organizing and keeping things modular.
That is easily sorted out using automated bu
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Daevid Vincent wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
include files, or a few big ones?
On 1/6/2010
Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
>> include files, or a few big ones?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/6/2
> -Original Message-
> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
> include files, or a few big ones?
>
>
>
> On 1/6/2010 7:18 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.a
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 1:05 PM +0100 8/9/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 07:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
>>
>> > But, as it was said, IE's have problems with first-child rules.
>>>
>>
>> How does IE8 fare with selectors in CSS?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ash
>
> ted
At 1:05 PM +0100 8/9/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 07:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
> But, as it was said, IE's have problems with first-child rules.
How does IE8 fare with selectors in CSS?
Thanks,
Ash
tedd = clue--
or
tedd < clue
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 07:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 10:54 AM +1000 8/9/09, Clancy wrote:
> >On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:53:42 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote:
> > >Also, if you use first-child, it could be taken down to:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yanni Nx
> >> Sally Riordan Sc
At 10:54 AM +1000 8/9/09, Clancy wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:53:42 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote:
>Also, if you use first-child, it could be taken down to:
Yanni Nx
Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
Except that line 2 is smaller than line 1. In my sche
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:53:42 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote:
>You don't need the width="210" height="300". For example, this works:
>
>
>
> Yanni Nx
> Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
>
I have read that if you omit the dimensions you will sometimes see the page
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 07:53 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 6:32 AM +0100 8/7/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >
> > >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yanni Nx
> >>Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> (And the t
At 6:32 AM +0100 8/7/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
Yanni Nx
Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
(And the thing that really astounds me about CSS is that they
never thought of putting in
constants. Instead o
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:32:48 +0100, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley Sheridan)
wrote:
...
>> How, for example, could I otherwise achieved the following effect, which
>> displays an image
>> with a border slightly darker than the background, and with the title and
>> subtitle inside
>> the b
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:06 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:28:32 +0100, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley
> Sheridan) wrote:
>
> ...
> >> >> Nested tables are the devils playthings!
> >>
> >> I must be the devil, then. I enjoy playing with them. And if they're
> >> done rig
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:28:32 +0100, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley Sheridan)
wrote:
...
>> >> Nested tables are the devils playthings!
>>
>> I must be the devil, then. I enjoy playing with them. And if they're done
>> right they
>> seem to work on every system I have tried them on. Gr
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:05 +0200, Ralph Deffke wrote:
> as it comes to this point I can recomment an O'reilly book "High Performance
> Web Sites, essential knowledge for frontend engineers"
>
> if u read that book ur eyes will grow and u will not bother about php
> comments,
>
> ralph
>
>
> "A
as it comes to this point I can recomment an O'reilly book "High Performance
Web Sites, essential knowledge for frontend engineers"
if u read that book ur eyes will grow and u will not bother about php
comments,
ralph
"Ashley Sheridan" wrote in message
news:1249543712.3358.104.ca...@localhost.
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:24 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:25:20 -0400, phps...@gmail.com (Bastien Koert) wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> >wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> >>> Thank you to all of you who have commented on t
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:25:20 -0400, phps...@gmail.com (Bastien Koert) wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
>wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
>>> Thank you to all of you who have commented on this query.
>>>
>>> On the subject of comments, I feel that La
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
>> Thank you to all of you who have commented on this query.
>>
>> On the subject of comments, I feel that Larry Garfield settled this query by
>> pointing out
>> that halving the size of a p
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> Thank you to all of you who have commented on this query.
>
> On the subject of comments, I feel that Larry Garfield settled this query by
> pointing out
> that halving the size of a particular document gave a barely noticeable
> increase in sp
Ollisso wrote:
4. If you have huge load, then it is much more efficient (and easier) to
use other methods. For Example: install APC (http://fi2.php.net/apc )
It will cache all requests to your files and this will have huge impact
on your performance. Much more than you can achieve by strippin
32 matches
Mail list logo
