RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread Demitrious S. Kelly
5:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP I haven't got around to reading all the other replies yet, so this reply might already be covered... So I went to that url - and okay, according to the person writing that page, there's a ~3sec increase in the time it ta

RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread Demitrious S. Kelly
ght matter greatly... its all situational. -Original Message- From: Demitrious S. Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:04 PM To: 'SP'; 'Remy Dufour'; 'Kondwani Spike Mkandawire'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OO

RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread Martin Towell
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:50 PM To: Kondwani Spike Mkandawire; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP OO is slower then procedural. You can test that out yourself or look at this article where the guy did a very basic test. Maybe they will fix the speed problem

RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread Demitrious S. Kelly
ROC: PHP Version: 4.1.2 Took 69.567726969719 seconds PHP Version: 4.2.1 Took 86.658290982246 seconds -Original Message- From: SP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:01 PM To: Remy Dufour; Kondwani Spike Mkandawire; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re:

RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread SP
PROTECTED]] Sent: June 27, 2002 1:34 PM To: SP; Kondwani Spike Mkandawire; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP I've tested thecode and there is what i've got Proceduraltook 1.24408602715 seconds OOtook 1.24240803719 seconds Here is the code. Test it by yourself t

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread B i g D o g
;Remy Dufour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kondwani Spike Mkandawire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP > I've tested thecode and there is

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread Remy Dufour
I've tested thecode and there is what i've got Proceduraltook 1.24408602715 seconds OOtook 1.24240803719 seconds Here is the code. Test it by yourself took ". (getmicrotime() - $time_start) ." seconds"; class count {function icount($vs) {$var=0; while($count < $vs) {

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread Erik Price
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, at 08:10 AM, Kondwani Spike Mkandawire wrote: > I still don't get what the big fuss of OO programming is about > I do agree that it is stylistic hence helps someone else who > hasn't written your code to follow up on what you are doing... > But so far the programs I

RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread SP
OO is slower then procedural. You can test that out yourself or look at this article where the guy did a very basic test. Maybe they will fix the speed problem by the time php5 comes around. http://www.phpbeginner.com/columns/demitrious/objects/8 -Original Message- From: Kondwani Spik

RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP

2002-06-27 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip] I still don't get what the big fuss of OO programming is about ...How many of us have done so? Could some one please point out another feasible advantage of OO programming a part from the fact that I would make someone else's work easier by using this style of programming... [/snip] It's