On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 14:44 -0500, Steve Staples wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:00 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 17:07 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Ashley Sheridan,
> > >
> > > Am 2011-01-08 17:09:27, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > > > Also, ea
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:00 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 17:07 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> > Hello Ashley Sheridan,
> >
> > Am 2011-01-08 17:09:27, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > > Also, each label is checked to ensure it doesn't run over 63 characters,
> > >
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Ashley Sheridan,
>
> Am 2011-01-08 17:09:27, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> Also, each label is checked to ensure it doesn't run over 63
>> characters, and the whole thing isn't over 253 characters. Lastly,
>> each label is checked to ensure it doesn't complete
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 17:07 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Ashley Sheridan,
>
> Am 2011-01-08 17:09:27, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > Also, each label is checked to ensure it doesn't run over 63 characters,
> > and the whole thing isn't over 253 characters. Lastly, each label is
> >
tedd wrote:
> At 11:54 AM +0100 1/11/11, Per Jessen wrote:
>>tedd wrote:
>>
>>> At that time, I registered almost 30 names.
>>> Fortunately, all of my names passed and I was
>>> permitted to keep them. Unfortunately, all
>>> browser manufactures (except Safari) negated some
>>> of the work do
At 11:54 AM +0100 1/11/11, Per Jessen wrote:
tedd wrote:
At that time, I registered almost 30 names.
Fortunately, all of my names passed and I was
permitted to keep them. Unfortunately, all
browser manufactures (except Safari) negated some
of the work done by the IDNS WG and as a result
P
tedd wrote:
> At that time, I registered almost 30 names.
> Fortunately, all of my names passed and I was
> permitted to keep them. Unfortunately, all
> browser manufactures (except Safari) negated some
> of the work done by the IDNS WG and as a result
> PUNYCODE is shown instead of the actual
> c
At 11:57 AM -0500 1/10/11, Steve Staples wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 11:39 -0500, tedd wrote:
> >>>For example --
>>>
>>>http://xn--19g.com
>>>
> >>>-- is square-root dot com.
on my Ubuntu box, I can copy and past the (square-root) character and
it displays properly in he address bar
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 11:39 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 11:41 AM -0600 1/9/11, Donovan Brooke wrote:
> >Daniel Brown wrote:
> >>On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:58, tedd wrote:
> >>>
> >>>For example --
> >>>
> >>>http://xn--19g.com
> >>>
> >>>-- is square-root dot com. In all browsers except Safari...
> >
>
At 11:41 AM -0600 1/9/11, Donovan Brooke wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:58, tedd wrote:
For example --
http://xn--19g.com
-- is square-root dot com. In all browsers except Safari...
but yes, the actual square root character appears in safari only.
Interesting!
Donov
At 12:23 PM -0500 1/9/11, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:58, tedd wrote:
For example --
http://xn--19g.com
> -- is square-root dot com. In all browsers except Safari, PUNYCODE is shown
in the address bar, but in Safari it's shown as .com
Not sure if that's a typo
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 12:38 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:32, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
> >
> > ^ is to the power of, not square root, which is √, which does translate to
> > Tedds domain
>
> Thanks for the math lesson, professor, but I already knew that. ;-P
>
>
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 12:23 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:58, tedd wrote:
> >
> > For example --
> >
> > http://xn--19g.com
> >
> > -- is square-root dot com. In all browsers except Safari, PUNYCODE is shown
> > in the address bar, but in Safari it's shown as ˆ.com
>
>
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:58, tedd wrote:
For example --
http://xn--19g.com
-- is square-root dot com. In all browsers except Safari, PUNYCODE is shown
in the address bar, but in Safari it's shown as ˆ.com
Not sure if that's a typo or an issue in translation while
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:32, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> ^ is to the power of, not square root, which is √, which does translate to
> Tedds domain
Thanks for the math lesson, professor, but I already knew that. ;-P
My point is, and as you can see in the quoted text from my email,
that
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:58, tedd wrote:
>
> For example --
>
> http://xn--19g.com
>
> -- is square-root dot com. In all browsers except Safari, PUNYCODE is shown
> in the address bar, but in Safari it's shown as ˆ.com
Not sure if that's a typo or an issue in translation while the
email was
At 12:15 PM +0100 1/9/11, Per Jessen wrote:
Tamara Temple wrote:
> I'm wondering what mods to make for this now that unicode chars are
allowed in domain names
You're talking about IDNs ? The actual domain name is still US-ASCII,
only when you decode punycode do you get UTF8 characters.
Tamara Temple wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Al wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/8/2011 3:55 AM, WalkinRaven wrote:
>>> PHP 5.3 PCRE
>>>
>>> Regular Express to match domain names format according to RFC 1034
>>> - DOMAIN
>>> NAMES - CONCEPTS AND FACILITIES
>>>
>>> /^
>>> (
>>> [a-z] |
>>> [a-z] (?:[a
On Jan 8, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Al wrote:
On 1/8/2011 3:55 AM, WalkinRaven wrote:
PHP 5.3 PCRE
Regular Express to match domain names format according to RFC 1034
- DOMAIN
NAMES - CONCEPTS AND FACILITIES
/^
(
[a-z] |
[a-z] (?:[a-z]|[0-9]) |
[a-z] (?:[a-z]|[0-9]|\-){1,61} (?:[a-z]|[0-9]) ) # O
19 matches
Mail list logo
