On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 13:25, jsWalter wrote:
>
> "Raditha Dissanayake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > hi,
> >
> > It's generaly considered that constructors are supposed return an
> > instance of that class. Use a factory instead if you want to return nulls;
>
>
"Curt Zirzow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The constructor should be as quick as possible and have as little
> logic as possible. What kind of failure are you trying to catch?
not really trying to 'catch' a failure.
I have to parse the given string format and d
"Raditha Dissanayake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hi,
>
> It's generaly considered that constructors are supposed return an
> instance of that class. Use a factory instead if you want to return nulls;
A Factory?
OK, I'll look that up, do some readng and try tha
* Thus wrote jsWalter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I found this in the docs...
>
>If you want your constructor to possibly not create the object
>
>class A
>{
> function A()
> {
> // ...
> // some error occurred
> $this = null;
> return;
>
hi,
It's generaly considered that constructors are supposed return an
instance of that class. Use a factory instead if you want to return nulls;
jsWalter wrote:
I found this in the docs...
If you want your constructor to possibly not create the object
class A
{
function A()
{
5 matches
Mail list logo
