On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:45:51 +0200, Christophe Chisogne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouter van Vliet a écrit :
> >>Note: The valid range of a timestamp is typically from Fri, 13 Dec
> >>1901 20:45:54 GMT to Tue, 19 Jan 2038 03:14:07 GMT. (These are the
> >>dates that correspond to the minimum and
Wouter van Vliet a écrit :
Note: The valid range of a timestamp is typically from Fri, 13 Dec
1901 20:45:54 GMT to Tue, 19 Jan 2038 03:14:07 GMT. (These are the
dates that correspond to the minimum and maximum values for a 32-bit
signed integer.)
To avoid unix timestamps limits, dont reinvent the
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:39:26 -0500, Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:03:09 +0200, Wouter van Vliet
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I would assume this to be a common problem, but as I wrote to this
> > list myself a couple of days ago I was only
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:03:09 +0200, Wouter van Vliet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I would assume this to be a common problem, but as I wrote to this
> list myself a couple of days ago I was only aware of it's existence on
> windows systems. Here's some sample code
>
> 12
4 matches
Mail list logo