Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +, Nuno Silva wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
>> i ran across this transaction problem vs. persistent conn in pgsql some time ago.
>>
>> I found two workaround methods:
>> - don't use persistent conn's :-) or;
>> - start every conn with the us
on 1/25/01 11:49 AM, Frank Joerdens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals say
>> they should work.
> It appears this riddle has been solved: From a po
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +, Nuno Silva wrote:
[ . . . ]
> i ran across this transaction problem vs. persistent conn in pgsql some time ago.
>
> I found two workaround methods:
> - don't use persistent conn's :-) or;
> - start every conn with the usual pg_pconnect and then query a ro
Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:10:54PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
>> OK, lets see if we can understand what each other is saying (maybe I'm not
>> getting your point here).
>> Lets say browser A connects to the apache server, to a page using php code.
>>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:10:54PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> OK, lets see if we can understand what each other is saying (maybe I'm not
> getting your point here).
> Lets say browser A connects to the apache server, to a page using php code.
> Lets say the code is OK (no bugs).
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 16:49, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
> > Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals
> > say they should work.
>
> It appears this riddle has been solved: From a post by Ada
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals say
> they should work.
It appears this riddle has been solved: From a post by Adam Lang on
pgsql-php on Dec 8:
Well, there's a problem with
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 14:34, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
> > No, and thats why in the postgres list we talked about persistent
> > connections not having much benefits. That is because the connection is
> > persistent to
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> No, and thats why in the postgres list we talked about persistent connections
> not having much benefits. That is because the connection is persistent to the
> httpd child that called it and not to all.
Well, yes, bu
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 10:21, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On the PostgreSQL lists there has been some discussion recently as to
> the mechanism behind, benefits and drawbacks, of persistent connections.
> In particular a scenario similar to the following was brought up:
>
> Browser A connects to Apache
10 matches
Mail list logo
