On 25 Oct 2013, at 12:51, Nibin V M wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response Stuart...one more doubt..at
> http://php.net/manual/en/features.persistent-connections.php they states
>
> =
> This means that when the same client makes a second request to the server, it
> may be served by
On 25 Oct 2013, at 11:10, Nibin V M wrote:
> I have been reading docs and many are telling that persistent connections
> are kept open indefinitely. But I found in PHP docs that it will not close
> after script execution like requesting a page; so should it close after
> the request is over?
>
> no, not at all... but there is a time and a place, and i don't think you
> should use pconnect just because you don't want to an include at the top
of
> every page.
You still have to call pconnect() on every page if you use it. It doesn't
leave it open for other requests, it leaves it open withi
no, not at all... but there is a time and a place, and i don't think you
should use pconnect just because you don't want to an include at the top of
every page.
- Original Message -
From: "John Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "php" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:11 PM
S
Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +, Nuno Silva wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
>> i ran across this transaction problem vs. persistent conn in pgsql some time ago.
>>
>> I found two workaround methods:
>> - don't use persistent conn's :-) or;
>> - start every conn with the us
on 1/25/01 11:49 AM, Frank Joerdens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals say
>> they should work.
> It appears this riddle has been solved: From a po
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +, Nuno Silva wrote:
[ . . . ]
> i ran across this transaction problem vs. persistent conn in pgsql some time ago.
>
> I found two workaround methods:
> - don't use persistent conn's :-) or;
> - start every conn with the usual pg_pconnect and then query a ro
Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:10:54PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
>> OK, lets see if we can understand what each other is saying (maybe I'm not
>> getting your point here).
>> Lets say browser A connects to the apache server, to a page using php code.
>>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:10:54PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> OK, lets see if we can understand what each other is saying (maybe I'm not
> getting your point here).
> Lets say browser A connects to the apache server, to a page using php code.
> Lets say the code is OK (no bugs).
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 16:49, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
> > Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals
> > say they should work.
>
> It appears this riddle has been solved: From a post by Ada
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:04:24PM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Of course. But the persistent connection are not working as the manuals say
> they should work.
It appears this riddle has been solved: From a post by Adam Lang on
pgsql-php on Dec 8:
Well, there's a problem with
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 14:34, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>
> > No, and thats why in the postgres list we talked about persistent
> > connections not having much benefits. That is because the connection is
> > persistent to
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0300, Martin A. Marques wrote:
[ . . . ]
> No, and thats why in the postgres list we talked about persistent connections
> not having much benefits. That is because the connection is persistent to the
> httpd child that called it and not to all.
Well, yes, bu
El Jue 25 Ene 2001 10:21, Frank Joerdens escribió:
> On the PostgreSQL lists there has been some discussion recently as to
> the mechanism behind, benefits and drawbacks, of persistent connections.
> In particular a scenario similar to the following was brought up:
>
> Browser A connects to Apache
14 matches
Mail list logo
