>That's a really interesting link. Thanks!
No problem, my pleasure
I was quite shocked to see how PHP performed
gcc still rocks though
Brent
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello John,
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 2:37:30 PM, you wrote:
JN> Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
You meant satanist, surely? ;)
(or a masochist!)
Ah, yes. My apologies, you're right. Evil has to stick together. An
Atheist wouldn't use anything sinc
> Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
> [/snip]
>
> And if so, what must a Buddhist use?
Lisp, of course.
-
michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/cahttp://mike.teczno.com/contact.html
--
PH
[snip]
Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
[/snip]
And if so, what must a Buddhist use?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
John Nichel wrote:
John W. Holmes wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Depends if you catholic or not.
Use what you know.
---John Holmes...
Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
oh d..n i hate ASP.
--
Raditha Dissana
John W. Holmes wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Depends if you catholic or not.
Use what you know.
---John Holmes...
Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Thanks,
JP
Well, Perl is older and has four letters in it's name. PHP has youth on
it's side. Perl is a Camel and PHP is a bird (Thrush or Roadrunner...I
don't know my birds). Perl is misspelled more often than PHP
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Depends if you catholic or not.
Use what you know.
---John Holmes...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
This is a religious question.
Thanks,
JP
--
Raditha Dissanayake.
-
http://www.radinks.com/print/upload.php
SFTP, FTP and HTTP File Upload solutions
--
PHP General
[snip]
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
[/snip]
That is like asking what would be the technical arguements of an 10"
miter saw and a 12" miter saw. Both are tools, each is better suited to
some things and not as well suited for others. In some projects we have
several differe
Paul Chvostek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
>
> I have to write a swath of code to manage system-related stuff based on
> database content. Scripts will be run as root by cron, and determine
> what they have to do via user interaction and SQL lookups. Functions
> will include manipulation of
I'm more comfortable writing stuff in PHP. I use PHP alot more, and I
find the resultant code more readable and easier to maintain. Aside
from Perl's ubiquity and the dubious advantage of future flexibility by
using Perl's DBI interface to talk to different SQL servers (I'm using
MySQL at the m
[PHP] PHP vs. PERL (Functional Comparison)??
> > ie. don't necessarily use 1 file per block, create functions that are
> > defined in a single file and call those instead of including a new file.
>
> How do you echo your html, do you put the html in your functions and
>
> > ie. don't necessarily use 1 file per block, create functions that are
> > defined in a single file and call those instead of including a new file.
>
> How do you echo your html, do you put the html in your functions and
> escape the double quotes? There is some extra load there echoing all the
> ie. don't necessarily use 1 file per block, create functions that are
> defined in a single file and call those instead of including a new file.
How do you echo your html, do you put the html in your functions and
escape the double quotes? There is some extra load there echoing all the
html?
T
> I mean, for example say you have
> an html that consists of blocks... Making every block
> an include is clean, but this time, php engine has to
> read all of these includes, and parse the html+php and
> compile/run php everytime a request is made??? I am
> not sure about this?
I wouldn't say i
> ??? I didn't get this? Aren't these pre-forked
> processes handle requests using threads internally?
> Say you configure apache to pre-fork 5 server
> processes, what you are saying implies that you can
> only handle 5 concurrent requests?? can you please
> explain this more?
That's exactly
> Threading instead of forking? None of these do
> either. Apache is a
> pre-forking multi-process server and both PHP and
> mod_perl are part of
> these pre-forked processes. Neither mod_perl nor
> PHP do any threading nor forking.
??? I didn't get this? Aren't these pre-forked
processes han
> Why on earth would you prefer java servlets?
Hmm... Let's see;Java is a full-fledge, totally OOP
and awesome programming language but not a scripting
language. Speed (will be mentioning this later),
having total control over whatever you want (exception
handling, db pooling, caching, syncrh
> 1.Speed: If you use mod_perl or fastcgi kind of deals
> (which are based on threadding instead of forking), I
> don't think PHP is considerably faster than perl? Is
> that the case?
Threading instead of forking? None of these do either. Apache is a
pre-forking multi-process server and both PH
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Bora Paksoy wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I am planning to implement a new site which will be
> using mysql db heavily, and I am in the middle of (and
> stuck:) deciding what I should use for implementation.
> I would definitely prefer Java Servlets, but it is
> very expensive to host ser
> I'm pretty new to programming - besides JavaScript, PHP is really the
first
> language I've used.
> I'm just wondering, and I'm sure you all would know - should I learn
Perl?
> Is it considered a necessity for a web developer to know Perl, or is
it not
> a worthwhile endeavor, considering how ea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd go for it. Perl can be messy, but it is also quite powerful and
doesn't HAVE to be messy. It is EVERYWHERE both in terms of availability
and use. But most of all, it is a fun language to play with... and if you
do any system admin it is an indispe
I personally try and avoid using Perl when I can. Perl is difficult to
learn to write proficient code in. Perl's moto is, "There is More Than
One Way to Do It" which also mean there are more than a million ways to
mess up. Depending upon the programmer Perl can be a write-only
language. You can ev
I do love perl, even if I mostly code with PHP, but I use perl for
stuff that run with a crontab (a script that run on every x date or
hours), I know that you can do that with PHP now too, but Perl is a
really great and funny language to learn, the best regular expression
that I ever use (I still
both are cool.
never heard of any holes as such,
Sincerely,
Maxim Maletsky
Founder, Chief Developer
PHPBeginner.com (Where PHP Begins)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.phpbeginner.com
-Original Message-
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL
someone recently posted a link to a benchmark test that was
done...there's never an absolute, but i do remember php w/zend as pretty
much whipping the competition...search the mailing list for the link if
you want to see for yourself...
-jack
David Hynes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to PHP (well
David Hynes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to PHP (well I used it years ago), and have been using Perl ever
> since.
>
> Someone told me that PHP is a lot more efficient than Perl, is this true ? I
> am developing a fairly large website using a MySQL database running on a
> cobalt RAQ3 server and so
> When Jason says 'especially when your note using the cgi' he means the
> cgi version of PHP (I think) in preference to installing PHP as an
> apache module.
Almost, yes - I literally meant the 'common gateway interface', due to the
fact that the webserver spawns the requested script/program ou
On Thursday 15 February 2001 08:03, Scott Mebberson wrote:
> When Jason says 'especially when your note using the cgi' he means the
> cgi version of PHP (I think) in preference to installing PHP as an
> apache module.
...just as using mod_perl is better than perl as CGI
--
Christian Reiniger
LG
When Jason says 'especially when your note using the cgi' he means the cgi
version of PHP (I think) in preference to installing PHP as an apache
module.
""Jason Brooke"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
04ad01c0970f$927eeff0$0100a8c0@jb">news:04ad01c0970f$927eeff0$0100a8c0@jb...
> > Is there
> Is there any reason why php is better than perl for shopping carts
> and/or product catalogs?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
It's hard to just come out and say that php is better than perl for shopping
carts because there's too many factors to take into consideration.
If you were a person who'd never use
32 matches
Mail list logo
