On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 14:41 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 14:17 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nathan
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 14:17 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > >
> > > > umm, so whats going on here is the implicit
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 14:17 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> >
> > > umm, so whats going on here is the implicit component of the statement
> > > that incorporates relative or absolute performance. in
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> > umm, so whats going on here is the implicit component of the statement
> > that incorporates relative or absolute performance. in terms of
> > relative performance the statement is accurate; in term
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> umm, so whats going on here is the implicit component of the statement
> that incorporates relative or absolute performance. in terms of
> relative performance the statement is accurate; in terms of absolute
> performance, its quite inaccurate.
>
Nathan, I think we're disa
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Nick Stinemates
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think there was a single place where I said PHP was faster
> >> than C, nor did I imply it.
> >
> >>
On Saturday 19 April 2008, Per Jessen wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > You are correct about asymptotic bounds on algorithms; however,
> > languages can still have a constant multiplier affect on an algorithm.
>
> Absolutely. When it comes to "how long does it take to process 1000
> elements",
Robert Cummings wrote:
> You are correct about asymptotic bounds on algorithms; however,
> languages can still have a constant multiplier affect on an algorithm.
Absolutely. When it comes to "how long does it take to process 1000
elements", both language and hardware are critical factors. But t
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 13:08 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Nick Stinemates
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think there was a single place where I said PHP was faster
> >> than C, nor did I imply it.
> >
> >> > Depends. Shit
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Nick Stinemates
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think there was a single place where I said PHP was faster
>> than C, nor did I imply it.
>
>> > Depends. Shitty algorithms are shitty, regardless of language
>> > implementation.
>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't think there was a single place where I said PHP was faster than
> C, nor did I imply it.
>
> > Depends. Shitty algorithms are shitty, regardless of language
> > implementation.
implies that the same algorithm
Nick Stinemates wrote:
> The point I was making is simple, if you have a shitty algorithm
> (which is the case for our op) expect shitty performance.
Agree completely, that's the case in a nutshell.
> There's no doubt you will gain performance moving to C, but, if
> properly designed, you have a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:58:14AM -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > If I wrote the console application in a c language (and compiled) would
> > one
> > > expect to see any improvements in performance? If so, how muc
>
> = C O D E ===S T AR T
> //this function is essentially a search and remove function for a nested
> array
>
>foreach ($arr as $key => $value) {
>//count($arr) == 3
>foreach ($value as $key2 => $value2) {
> //0<=count($value) <=1000
>fore
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > If I wrote the console application in a c language (and compiled) would
> one
> > expect to see any improvements in performance? If so, how much
> improvement
> > could one expect (in general)?
>
> Depends. Shitty alg
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:30:00PM -0500, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing a PHP script for a local application (not web/html based). My
> script is taking a longer time to execute than I want. The source code is
> a few thousand lines, so I will spare you all this level of detail.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Like I said before, since you know that most of your time is in a
> > specific part of your script, just move that function into a custom
> > ext
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Eric Butera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like I said before, since you know that most of your time is in a
> specific part of your script, just move that function into a custom
> extension written in c/c++.
>
> http://talks.php.net/show/extending-php-apachecon2003/
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Daniel Kolbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Struan Donald wrote:
>
> > * at 17/04 16:30 -0500 Daniel Kolbo said:
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am writing a PHP script for a local application (not web/html
> > > based). My script is taking a longer time to
Struan Donald wrote:
* at 17/04 16:30 -0500 Daniel Kolbo said:
Hello,
I am writing a PHP script for a local application (not web/html
based). My script is taking a longer time to execute than I want. The
source code is a few thousand lines, so I will spare you all this
level of detail.
I
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> If I wrote the console application in a c language (and compiled)
> would one expect to see any improvements in performance? If so, how
> much improvement could one expect (in general)?
You haven't given us much to work with, so it's a wild guess, but I
think you'd probably
* at 17/04 16:30 -0500 Daniel Kolbo said:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing a PHP script for a local application (not web/html
> based). My script is taking a longer time to execute than I want. The
> source code is a few thousand lines, so I will spare you all this
> level of detail.
>
> I prefer to wri
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Kolbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing a PHP script for a local application (not web/html based). My
> script is taking a longer time to execute than I want. The source code is a
> few thousand lines, so I will spare you all this level
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Kolbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing a PHP script for a local application (not web/html based).
> My script is taking a longer time to execute than I want. The source code
> is a few thousand lines, so I will spare you all this level
24 matches
Mail list logo
