On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 05:36:30AM -0700, Robert Mena wrote:
> Hi Thies,
>
> Yes, httpd is linked against pthread.
> I've compiled 4.0.4pl1 and so far it is working ok.
> This problem (segmentation fault) seems to be
> happening quite often (after reading some posts).
a backtrace would be u
Hi Thies,
Yes, httpd is linked against pthread.
I've compiled 4.0.4pl1 and so far it is working ok.
This problem (segmentation fault) seems to be
happening quite often (after reading some posts).
ldd /usr/sbin/httpd
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4001a000)
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 06:51:35AM -0700, Robert Mena wrote:
> Hi, I have a development machine with 4.0.4pl1 which
> has been used for creating a set of scripts to access
> oracle (using stored procedures).
>
> It seems to be working fine (the problems that I've
> encountered seems to be related
On 5/10/01 10:39 AM, "Dominic Schanen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With v4.0.4pl1, everything works great. With v4.0.5, everything builds and
> compiles just fine. However, when I go to a page that try to access MySQL,
> the page stops loading and the first instance of trying to access MySQL and
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Gollmer) wrote:
> >I only mention them since they got parsed before. They are php files
> >that the designers here have created in HomeSite and saved as PC
> >format, so they are basically 1 long line when I open them in v
Hello,
If you have segfault, compile PHP with debug option and backtrace with gdb, then
send the backtrace and short script that causes segfault.
Instruction can be found at
http://www.php.net/bugs-dos-and-donts.php
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
"Darron Froese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messag
I too had to downgrade to PHP 4.0.4pl1. Version 4.0.5 would not let me
load my extensions(dynamically).
PHP+Apache
Win 98
__John Monfort_
_+---+_
P E P I E D E S I G N S
www.pepiedesigns.com
"The world is waiting, a
On 5/2/01 10:16 AM, "John Huggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I were you I would let the PHP guys figure this out. I am sure they read
> messages here so stick with 4.04p11 and live on. I was just about to
> download 4.0.5, but I want your issue to be addressed before I waste my time
> wit
If I were you I would let the PHP guys figure this out. I am sure they read
messages here so stick with 4.04p11 and live on. I was just about to
download 4.0.5, but I want your issue to be addressed before I waste my time
with a recompile.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Darron Froes
Apparently the zip is indeed broken. We'll try to get a fixed one up there
soon.
Sorry for the hassle,
Zeev
At 01:21 1/5/2001, SHAWN wrote:
>Is anyone else having problems with the Windows binary zip? I've downloaded
>it a couple times and it keeps saying that it's corrupt.
>
>Thanks!
>Shawn
Yes it is, it's much more efficient.
Zeev
At 01:05 1/5/2001, Aaron Tuller wrote:
>>At 12:12 AM +0300 5/1/01, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>>- Implemented high-performance zlib-based output compression - see
>> zlib.output_compression INI directive. (Zeev)
>
>is this different from ob_gzhandler()? if s
Shawn,
Had the same problem - looks like the zip file is corrupted - you could try
zipfix but it's reporting that there are 88 bytes missing.
Chris
SHAWN wrote:
> Is anyone else having problems with the Windows binary zip? I've downloaded
> it a couple times and it keeps saying that it's corr
Is anyone else having problems with the Windows binary zip? I've downloaded
it a couple times and it keeps saying that it's corrupt.
Thanks!
Shawn Sellars
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
>At 12:12 AM +0300 5/1/01, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>- Implemented high-performance zlib-based output compression - see
> zlib.output_compression INI directive. (Zeev)
is this different from ob_gzhandler()? if so, how is it different? thanks.
-aaron
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.n
Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a CVS installed on one of my machines, but the RCX are not published
> on the web site. That's what I'm copmplaining about!!
hmm I though they got a tag in the cvs resp, well it might be thats
only the releases that get a tag
--
Henrik Hans
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:01:27AM +0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> On Mar 24 Abr 2001 16:34, The Doctor wrote:
> > On another front, will PHP 4.0.5 be compilable for a STATIC apache 2.0
> > Beta?
>
> As far as I know, yes! There is at configure time an option to use
> apache-2.0. Never used it.
>
On Mar 24 Abr 2001 16:34, The Doctor wrote:
> On another front, will PHP 4.0.5 be compilable for a STATIC apache 2.0
> Beta?
As far as I know, yes! There is at configure time an option to use
apache-2.0. Never used it.
saludos... :-)
--
El mejor sistema operativo es aquel que te da de comer.
On another front, will PHP 4.0.5 be compilable for a STATIC apache 2.0 Beta?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 24 Abr 2001 01:33, Henrik Hansen wrote:
> Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Lun 23 Abr 2001 22:13, Felix Kronlage wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:00:07PM -0700, Dominique Paquin wrote:
> > > > I asked when the new version of PHP was comming out at the beginning
>
Or it could be RC8 that will be the last one :)
Then again, that's why it's called an RC (Release Candidate...or something
similar). Nice to know that when you get a new version it's been hammered to
death to squish all the latent bugs. Unlike some people...*cough*
--
Plutarck
Should be workin
Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Lun 23 Abr 2001 22:13, Felix Kronlage wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:00:07PM -0700, Dominique Paquin wrote:
> > > I asked when the new version of PHP was comming out at the beginning of
> > > the month and some one told me that it was comm
Felix Kronlage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:00:07PM -0700, Dominique Paquin wrote:
>
> > I asked when the new version of PHP was comming out at the beginning of the
> > month and some one told me that it was comming out the week after. Haven't
> > seen it yet, any
On Lun 23 Abr 2001 22:13, Felix Kronlage wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:00:07PM -0700, Dominique Paquin wrote:
> > I asked when the new version of PHP was comming out at the beginning of
> > the month and some one told me that it was comming out the week after.
> > Haven't seen it yet, anyone
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:00:07PM -0700, Dominique Paquin wrote:
> I asked when the new version of PHP was comming out at the beginning of the
> month and some one told me that it was comming out the week after. Haven't
> seen it yet, anyone knows the release date??
RC7 got out a few days ago (
Annotated manual is useful. Refer to
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.linux.php
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.apache.php
You need to install apache-devel RPM if you are using RedHat.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
""Paul Juliano"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
x27;s working now!!! YAY!
Now I need to parse the output and send a message with only the requested
parts.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP is not a drug ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:57 PM
Subj
Hello Robert,
(R == "Robert") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
R> PHP 4.0.5.dev I installed it on my Windows 2000 Pro machine with
R> IIS and MySQL and it works like a champ I installed it on my
R> Windows NT Server with IIS and MSSQL and it will not read the
R> php.ini file I put it in the following
27 matches
Mail list logo
