On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:19:04PM -0500, Plutarck wrote:
> For instance, when they say not to use 4 spaces (or was it 3?) instead of
> tabs? I think that's stupid, and I don't do it. But they did it for a
> reason, even if I don't understand it.
tabs might break going from one platform to anot
As long as PEAR standars are enforced ONLY for the PEAR library, then it's
ok. It makes it alot easier to read such code if all of it's contents use
the same style.
But when they try to reach over and make all applications do it, then it's
too far. But I don't see them trying to do that.
When PE
> "shaun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> I'm pretty sure you can make php use the asp style % though too, not
> sure if that's for short tags, regular tags or both, I know it's in
> the config though, anyone know?
Info related to the above can be seen here :
http://www.php.net/manual/en/langua
(Reply to your TOFU:)
"shaun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 01040817181702.01567@box">news:01040817181702.01567@box...
> I'm pretty sure you can make php use the asp style % though too, not sure
if
> that's for short tags, regular tags or both, I know it's in the config
> though, anyone kn
I'm pretty sure you can make php use the asp style % though too, not sure if
that's for short tags, regular tags or both, I know it's in the config
though, anyone know?
Shaun
On Saturday 07 April 2001 18:46, Michael Kimsal wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Dean Hall wrote:
> > "Michael Kimsal" <[E
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Dean Hall wrote:
> "Michael Kimsal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm not sure why XML is an issue. Does XML use the ? in it's syntax? XML
> > tags are, to my knowledge, of the style. Am I missing
> > something?
"Michael Kimsal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm not sure why XML is an issue. Does XML use the ? in it's syntax? XML
> tags are, to my knowledge, of the style. Am I missing
> something? I admit it's been a bit since I've gotten into dea
>
> > If the people defining the PEAR standards really were that interested in
> > standards, why include alternate ways of doing something?
> > And if the 'short tag' method is useful enough for people, why 'exclude'
> it
> > from a standard? This notion of 'PEAR standards' does irk me some,
8 matches
Mail list logo
