On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 09:52, Terence wrote:
>
> PS.
> Stop teasing us and give us the link to your open-source solution. I may
> be able to poach some ideas for my open-source solution :)
>
Look no further than the signature. I thought it was bulky enough, but I
guess I'll need to make it bigge
Rush wrote:
"Terence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>
If you *do* finally decide to master XSLT, you have to conclude that
*any* other templating system is a complete/utter waste of time. (all
authors of ``yet another PHP templating system'', please try not to be
off
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 08:18, Terence wrote:
Bloody hell Rob, you've started me on another rant when I could be in bed ;)
*grin* glad to help out.
XSLT is a pain in the butt if you want to master it - particularly if
you're going from imperative programming to declarat
"Terence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <>
> If you *do* finally decide to master XSLT, you have to conclude that
> *any* other templating system is a complete/utter waste of time. (all
> authors of ``yet another PHP templating system'', please try not to be
> offend
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 08:18, Terence wrote:
>
> Bloody hell Rob, you've started me on another rant when I could be in bed ;)
>
*grin* glad to help out.
> XSLT is a pain in the butt if you want to master it - particularly if
> you're going from imperative programming to declarative (maybe XPath
Hi Terrence
The only thing that disagree with in your whole post is 'XSLT is a pain
in the butt' far from it. I aint no master either but i really like it.
XSLT is a pain in the butt if you want to master it - particularly if
you're going from imperative programming to declarative (maybe XPath
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:30, Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
Hi,
Please give it a shot, it's real easy. far easier than any of the lame
php template systems i have seen. The beauty is that the same XML/XSL
combo can be used with PHP, perl, JSP/Servlets, C++, VC++,VB,C,C# and
The ones I tried were lame. Haven't studied your engine yet so i have
yet to decide whether it's lame or not ;-)
best regards
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:30, Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
Hi,
Please give it a shot, it's real easy. far easier than any of the lame
php templa
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:30, Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please give it a shot, it's real easy. far easier than any of the lame
> php template systems i have seen. The beauty is that the same XML/XSL
> combo can be used with PHP, perl, JSP/Servlets, C++, VC++,VB,C,C# and
> the list goe
Hi,
Please give it a shot, it's real easy. far easier than any of the lame
php template systems i have seen. The beauty is that the same XML/XSL
combo can be used with PHP, perl, JSP/Servlets, C++, VC++,VB,C,C# and
the list goes on and on.
Disclaimer: I have never written a single line of VB ,
Hi Terence,
I am equally puzzled as to why people are using all sorts of crappy
proprietory template systems instead of XSLT. It's particularly useful
when dealing with WAP. I suspect the reason could well be the
inconsistencies in compiling php with XSLT support. compiling the
Sablatron modul
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 07:21, Terence wrote:
>
> The publication of the project itself was partially motivated by the
> discussions that took place in this thread (A Complete List of PHP
> Template Engines?) which basically sees me arguing for the usage of
> standards (XSLT) rather than having t
12 matches
Mail list logo
