Re: [PHP] Interesting problem in PHP and Squirrelmail

2006-01-18 Thread Robert Cummings
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 16:20, Mark wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > > > > The implementation is slightly more difficult than what I've just > > described, but simple enough :) > > It's truly ugly, don't you think? Actually I find it quite elegant, but maybe that's just me :) Cheers, Rob. -- .-

Re: [PHP] Interesting problem in PHP and Squirrelmail

2006-01-18 Thread Richard Lynch
On Wed, January 18, 2006 2:36 pm, Mark wrote: > Here's a point of debate, should this sort of behavior be allowed? Of course it should be allowed! It's a standard computer science technique! There are entire branches of mathematics / science devoted to recursive graph theory. Whole *BOOKS* writ

Re: [PHP] Interesting problem in PHP and Squirrelmail

2006-01-18 Thread Mark
Robert Cummings wrote: > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 15:36, Mark wrote: >> >> [-- CLIPPED --] >> >> Here's a point of debate, should this sort of behavior be allowed? If it >> is allowable, how does one support it in any sort of serialized >> methodology? I have a few ideas but none very pretty. I'm pre

Re: [PHP] Interesting problem in PHP and Squirrelmail

2006-01-18 Thread Robert Cummings
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 15:44, Robert Cummings wrote: > > Yes it should be allowed, Actualy was just thinking about how I didn't allow this in JavaScript... you might want to make it an option as a second parameter to recurse. I know in JavaScript any DOM element references the entire DOM tree and y

Re: [PHP] Interesting problem in PHP and Squirrelmail

2006-01-18 Thread Robert Cummings
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 15:36, Mark wrote: > > [-- CLIPPED --] > > Here's a point of debate, should this sort of behavior be allowed? If it is > allowable, how does one support it in any sort of serialized methodology? I > have a few ideas but none very pretty. I'm pretty sure it causes problems > in