, as 1 images
>>in a single directory might slow down access to those images in the
>>filesystem, or not so?
>>
>>Thanks for your input.
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>-Scott
>>
>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: DL Neil [mailto:
o?
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> Regards
>
> -Scott
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: DL Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 21 August 2002 04:31
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bogdan Stancescu
>> Subject: Re: [PHP] Image library
>>
>>
[snip]
> Having a large number of files in a single directory does affect
performance,
> the degree of which depends on the filesystem.
This is generally accepted wisdom for dealing with large numbers of files -
but what number is considered "large"?
Any rules of thumb, for different OpSys/file s
> Having a large number of files in a single directory does affect
performance,
> the degree of which depends on the filesystem.
This is generally accepted wisdom for dealing with large numbers of files -
but what number is considered "large"?
Any rules of thumb, for different OpSys/file systems
On Thursday 22 August 2002 00:35, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> ... but surely one should store files across directories, as 1 images
> in a single directory might slow down access to those images in the
> filesystem, or not so?
> [/snip]
>
> Not really. The server really does not care where
[snip]
... but surely one should store files across directories, as 1 images in
a single directory might slow down access to those images in the filesystem,
or not so?
[/snip]
Not really. The server really does not care where the files are and no
performance would be lost.
Jay
*
hanks for your input.
>
> Regards
>
> -Scott
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: DL Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 21 August 2002 04:31
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bogdan Stancescu
> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Image library
> >
> >
mages in the
filesystem, or not so?
Thanks for your input.
Regards
-Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: DL Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 August 2002 04:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bogdan Stancescu
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Image library
>
>
> Scott (confirm
same file(?)
> > Is there a better way of doing this?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Justin French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: 21 August 2002 03:25
> >>To: [
l, the only time you should overwrite a
> file is if you upload the exact same file(?)
> Is there a better way of doing this?
>
> Cheers
>
> -Scott
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Justin French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 21 August 2002 03:2
that helps - but I thought I'd share my experience.
Michael.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 14:39
To: Justin French; PHP General
Subject: RE: [PHP] Image library
Hi all.
This confirms what I suspected.
The hash algrithm:
file(?)
Is there a better way of doing this?
Cheers
-Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 August 2002 03:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PHP General
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Image library
>
>
> on 21/08/02 9:45 PM, Scott
on 21/08/02 9:45 PM, Scott Houseman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Which way would be the most efficient/fastest to access images from an image
> library.
> A) Store image files in a hash directory structure AND storing each file's
> information in a mysql table
> OR
> B) Storing image information
13 matches
Mail list logo