>From: "Vivian Steller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Are there any thoughts about that in future releases?
> >> What do other developers think about this issue?
> >> How do organize multiple used classnames?
> >
> > The common answer is: "Use a prefix"...
> but i really dislike using cryptic and long
Vivian Steller wrote:
...
Thanks for metioning this issue! This is another point where I think OO is
done the half way in PHP:
Why do we need some implicit type check, like
public method(Type $type)
if we then loose the optional parameter advantage?
I don't know *the* answer. So far as I c
Thanks for your answer!
Terje Slettebà wrote:
>>From: "Vivian Steller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture.
>>
>> Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP?
>
> This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the "nested class"
> thread),
>From: "Vivian Steller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture.
>
> Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP?
This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the "nested class"
thread), called "namespaces", but there wasn't a lot of enthusiasm for
4 matches
Mail list logo