Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-02-03 Thread Terje SlettebÃ
>From: "Vivian Steller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Are there any thoughts about that in future releases? > >> What do other developers think about this issue? > >> How do organize multiple used classnames? > > > > The common answer is: "Use a prefix"... > but i really dislike using cryptic and long

Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-01-31 Thread Jason Barnett
Vivian Steller wrote: ... Thanks for metioning this issue! This is another point where I think OO is done the half way in PHP: Why do we need some implicit type check, like public method(Type $type) if we then loose the optional parameter advantage? I don't know *the* answer. So far as I c

Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-01-30 Thread Vivian Steller
Thanks for your answer! Terje Slettebà wrote: >>From: "Vivian Steller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture. >> >> Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP? > > This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the "nested class" > thread),

Re: [PHP] General question: packaging in PHP

2005-01-30 Thread Terje Slettebø
>From: "Vivian Steller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i've a general question concerning PHP's architecture. > > Why isn't there a native packaging concept in PHP? This was also suggested on comp.lang.php, recently (the "nested class" thread), called "namespaces", but there wasn't a lot of enthusiasm for