Diogo Neves schreef:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please keep replies on list unless your intending to pay me
an hourly fee ...
Yeap, i'm new in the list and i missed te cc of list... i'll try to
remember, sorry
okay.
Diogo Neves schreef:
N
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please keep replies on list unless your intending to pay me
> an hourly fee ...
Yeap, i'm new in the list and i missed te cc of list... i'll try to
remember, sorry
>
> Diogo Neves schreef:
Now in understand "schreef"
please keep replies on list unless your intending to pay me
an hourly fee ...
Diogo Neves schreef:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Diogo Neves schreef:
...
nop... I wanna manipulate the $this and the $arguments, and possible
don't even execute the pr
Diogo Neves schreef:
thanks,
well, the 'new' woks the same with ou without '()' after class, I think...
you think? I gave you code that shows exactly that.
but you wrote the following:
new $user = new user();
which is not correct, the first new in that line is a syntax error.
that me
thanks,
well, the 'new' woks the same with ou without '()' after class, I think...
and I now how it works, i only don't understand why... if the method
is not available outside of class it should go to __call function like
if it doesn't exist...
it doesn't make any sense to anyone else?
On Sat,
Diogo Neves schreef:
hi all,
I'm sending this email only to ask if someone know if the works of
__call in private methods is bug or feature.
ex.
class user {
public function __call ( $name, $arguments ) {
do something
return call_user_func( array( $this, $name ), $arguments );
the fatal erro
6 matches
Mail list logo