Investing your time on Zend Framework is worth it.I do mostly php
development under Magento Platform, and Zend Framework becomes one of
the vital skills I need.Apart from that, ZF is also a well thought
Library that is a joy to work with.As one mentioned, the best part of it
it gives the option to
On 21 July 2011 23:56, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
>> get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
>> about intermediate in PHP knowledge.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
> admin of your tables/models if you wish.
Oooh, interesting! I will check out CakePHP! Thanks for tip! :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscri
On 07/21/2011 07:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
>> Your app models?
>
> More specifically, your app model data. :)
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if you wish.
--
Thanks!
-Shawn
h
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> Your app models?
More specifically, your app model data. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
> So, what would said admin interface allow you to administrate?
Your app models?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 7/21/2011 4:00 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> +1 for CI.
>
> If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
> micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
>
> So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
> That would be pretty sweet. :)
>
So, w
+1 for CI.
If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
That would be pretty sweet. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscri
On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
> get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
> about intermediate in PHP knowledge.
>
> Thank you,
So, with your post you will probabl
Phpster wrote:
Sorry for top posting, but here goes...
Stopping third party js from running on the client will never happen. If
so, you just killed your servers thru put in attempting to handle things
like google maps, google analytics and other fun things coming out of
companies like that (
Sorry for top posting, but here goes...
Stopping third party js from running on the client will never happen.
If so, you just killed your servers thru put in attempting to handle
things like google maps, google analytics and other fun things coming
out of companies like that ( google, zoho
Bob McConnell wrote:
However, don't limit it to classes. There
are enough non-OO people that collections of usable function libraries
should also be worth assembling. I would also suggest including unit
test fixtures and utilities in any collection.
Bob McConnell
Most functions can be wrappe
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
P.P.P.S. What might be nice is to have an online repository of "PHP
community approved" classes, then programmers could mix and match
'modules' as needed...well now I am sounding like that snake oil salesman.
There is a php class web site that focuses on OO programm
Sancar Saran wrote:
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
No it won't.
People are getting sick and tired of allowing third scripts to modify
the DOM - browsers are
From: Daniel Kolbo
>
> P.P.P.S. What might be nice is to have an online repository of "PHP
> community approved" classes, then programmers could mix and match
> 'modules' as needed...well now I am sounding like that snake oil
salesman.
You mean something like CPAN over in the Perl arena? Or som
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:24:55 Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:58 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
> > On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
> > > > Probably a bit off topic and
> > > >
> > > > The Game is
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 10:43 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >
> >My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
> >come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
> >lifespan or efficacy in any particular environment. The
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tedd wrote:
> At 10:50 AM -0400 3/23/09, Bastien Koert wrote:
>>
>> Tedd,
>>
>> JS has been running on MS servers for a long time. It was always viewes as
>> an acceptable replacement for vbscript.
>
> Well -- that's been my fear. I think that M$ is trying to get
At 10:50 AM -0400 3/23/09, Bastien Koert wrote:
Tedd,
JS has been running on MS servers for a long time. It was always
viewes as an acceptable replacement for vbscript.
Well -- that's been my fear. I think that M$ is trying to get it's
foot into this so they can charge for it -- similar to t
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Arno Kuhl wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
> > Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
> > To: php-general@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Framework
Arno Kuhl wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
> Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
>
> Probably a bit off topic and
>
> The Game is over man.
-Original Message-
From: Sancar Saran [mailto:sancar.sa...@evodot.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 11:52 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS
@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks / obstinate?
2009/3/23 tedd :
> However, I have heard of "new" javascript being run server-side.
What's the
> likelihood of that "catching on" and surpassing php?
http://aptana.com/jaxer
I really like the idea, but I'm
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:43 AM, tedd wrote:
> At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>>
>> My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
>> come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
>> lifespan or efficacy in any particular environment. Th
2009/3/23 tedd :
> However, I have heard of "new" javascript being run server-side. What's the
> likelihood of that "catching on" and surpassing php?
http://aptana.com/jaxer
I really like the idea, but I'm yet to have a good reason to try it.
If you're starting from scratch it has the advantage o
At 10:24 AM -0400 3/23/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
My point is, just because new techniques and technoloigies
come out, is in no way a boundary condition on an existing technology's
lifespan or efficacy in any particular environment. The deprecation of
usefulness of any technology is based on man
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:58 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
> > > Probably a bit off topic and
> > >
> > > The Game is over man.
> > >
> > > Javascript coming with flank speed. Next gener
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:33:58 Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
> > Probably a bit off topic and
> >
> > The Game is over man.
> >
> > Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will
> > take html generation jobs from server sid
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:52 +0200, Sancar Saran wrote:
> Probably a bit off topic and
>
> The Game is over man.
>
> Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
> html generation jobs from server side.
>
> Whole thing of Server Side MVC and other yada yada was beca
Probably a bit off topic and
The Game is over man.
Javascript coming with flank speed. Next generation JS Framworks will take
html generation jobs from server side.
Whole thing of Server Side MVC and other yada yada was became joke. Those
server siders become JSON pushers for JS frameworks.
A
Marc Christopher Hall wrote:
My personal take on this goes something like this:
I'm not a huge fan of re-inventing the wheel. However, it seems that since
the first stable release of PHP 5 into the wild a much needed emphasis has
been placed on OOP solutions within the PHP world. Don't read me
My personal take on this goes something like this:
I'm not a huge fan of re-inventing the wheel. However, it seems that since
the first stable release of PHP 5 into the wild a much needed emphasis has
been placed on OOP solutions within the PHP world. Don't read me wrong, I
know the importance was
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 10:54 -1000, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I changed the subject because I did not want to steal Nitsan's thread.
I hope you started a "New" email and didn't just change the subject...
otherwise you've hijacked the thread. I can't tell I keep threading off.
> There see
"Nitsan Bin-Nun" wrote in message
news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com...
> Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
>
> Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
> fastest time to learn and get into code?
Generally speaking if s
Qcodo and symfony both have an ORM layer that can do that. They will
provide/return and basic set of classes that interact with those tables.
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Mar 22, 2009, at 11:52, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have been using cakephp for a while as a development framewor
Don't forget to attach the message to the list.
Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the
fastest time to learn and get into code?
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Graham Christensen <
graham.christen...@iamgraham.net> wrote:
> Look into Doctorine &|| Prope
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
I'd love to lol - but really n
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> haliphax wrote:
>>
>> Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
>
> by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
--
// Todd
--
PHP General Mailing List
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overh
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to m
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
> haliphax wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
>> discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
>> writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
>> dev
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to make for ANY of the
framework
> wrote:
>> @todd; Micah - Precisely why I presented the question anew. Not only do I
>> not have enough time to troll through the archives; I was looking for a
>> fresher set of responses based on today's smorgasbord. Thank you for your
>> input; I have looked at both YII and CI and they look
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Marc Christopher Hall
wrote:
> @todd; Micah - Precisely why I presented the question anew. Not only do I not
> have enough time to troll through the archives; I was looking for a fresher
> set of responses based on today's smorgasbord. Thank you for your input; I
does seem to be a promising
future contender.
Thanks - Marc
"Measure twice and cut once."
-Original Message-
From: haliphax [mailto:halip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:00 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
On Sun, Mar 8, 2
details at http://www.yiiframework.com/
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Micah Gersten [mailto:news.php@micahscomputing.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:52 AM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
>>
>> HallMa
ahscomputing.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:52 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
>
> HallMarc Websites wrote:
>> First time caller; long time listener..
>>
>>
>>
>> I have been looking at various PHP MVC
HallMarc Websites wrote:
> First time caller; long time listener..
>
>
>
> I have been looking at various PHP MVC frameworks; Limb3, Symphony, Mojavi,
> Navigator, WACT, etc.
>
> I'm looking for any input anyone might have regarding which framework seems
> to be the most promising?
>
>
>
Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
In Israel most of the servesr run centos
I first came across centos a few years back at a client's
hosting facility and had never heard of it before, though it
seems to have a large install base.
I heard it's a free version of Enterprise Redhat???
Not sure, though, di
If you would have drawn a graph of technological development of Israel I
guess that you would have got something like a straight line with a really
big inclination.
People here want to start developing online when they doesn't even know the
basics, most of the server administrators here installs ph
Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
I usually uses CI, just because it is written in PHP4 and in about 50% of
the servers in Israel there is no PHP5 :X
I am just curious. Why is PHP 5 so rare there?
--
Skip Evans
Big Sky Penguin, LLC
503 S Baldwin St, #1
Madison WI 53703
He is right.
CI is the fastest, but ZEND has awesome flexibility.
I usually uses CI, just because it is written in PHP4 and in about 50% of
the servers in Israel there is no PHP5 :X
But I really like Zend.
I will suggest the OP to download the latest CI (as far as I remember the
version is 1.7.0)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Frank Stanovcak
wrote:
> Ok. I've done some reading on frameworks for PHP now, and have this
> question.
>
> What are some good resources for learning about the various frameworks
> available, and do you recomend one over another? If so why?
>
> I started using P
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Frank Stanovcak
wrote:
> Ok. I've done some reading on frameworks for PHP now, and have this
> question.
>
> What are some good resources for learning about the various frameworks
> available, and do you recomend one over another? If so why?
>
> I started using P
Andrés Robinet wrote:
Anyway... you will get one thousand opinions about Frameworks, and 90% of them
may be correct. Choose the framework you like after playing around with some
examples and having an overview of the reference manual (forgot to say,
documentation is really important to get you st
> -Original Message-
> From: Aschwin Wesselius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:04 PM
> To: Andrés Robinet
> Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Frameworks
>
> Andrés Robinet wrote:
> > I want a framework I can plu
> -Original Message-
> From: Aschwin Wesselius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:14 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Frameworks
>
> Hi all,
>
> Maybe this has past the list a couple of times (just like the 'storing
> images in a DB' question)
Andrés Robinet wrote:
I want a framework I can plug a microphone in, and talk to it, and it does the
job for me (really, I need it). But I guess we are far away from that.
You need it? And what happens if you won't get it in a life time?
If you need REAL RAD ("a la Delphi"), use VCL for PHP.
On 3/12/08, Aschwin Wesselius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm after is a framework that is simple, solid, compact and
> flexible enough to extend by myself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#Comparison_of_features
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
I think you pegged it... the benefit is that you save time, the
drawback is that you're limited in what you can do. I think you have
to review each framework and chose one based on your personal
preferences, the project at hand, etc.
On Nov 2, 2006, at 7:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
I am using Code Igniter on two projects at the moment and I am loving it.
All the tedious, repetitive elements are reduced, security is increased and
code organised in a clean fashion (you can of course mis-use frameworks but
with effort they can promote and facilitate a cleaner, more modular appr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know this subject has been covered in the past, but my question is why
> use them?
it's kind of the same question as 'why use software libraries?' - which is
kind of answered by 'do you want to write your own TCP/IP stack *everytime*
you write a network enabled piece
I personal prefer Frameworks. I tried some of them.
But in my opinion, those are not made to create application fater, no.
With Frameworks, you can maintaine your application better. You have a global
place where everything can be changed on one file. Ofc, its also possible
that this improves
> I know this subject has been covered in the past, but my question is why
> use them? I'm hoping to not create a religious war... I see that
> frameworks would probably help you develop some things faster, but most
> of the time they don't do the things the way I would want them to work.
> If I
Hello,
on 08/06/2006 09:52 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
>> >> Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the
>> state
>> >> of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what
>> suits
>> >> best for you:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/
Hello,
on 08/05/2006 11:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
This is necessary to escape wildcards characters that should be taken
literally in patterns. It is needed to implement the auto-complete
feature using SQL conditions of type field LIKE 'typed-text%'. If
typed-tex
2006/8/4, Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 05:18 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
>> Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
>> of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what
suits
>> best for you:
>>
>> http://www
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 15:36 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/04/2006 05:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
> >> The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
> >> recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
> >> does n
Hello,
on 08/04/2006 05:47 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
>> The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
>> recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
>> does not mean they will suit everybody.
> How would you know that the
"Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
>> >>> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
>> >>> pla
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 05:18 PM Martin Alterisio said the following:
>> Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
>> of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
>> best for you:
>>
>> http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-fr
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:23 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
> >>> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> >>> place was :
> >>>
> >>> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:52 PM Kilbride, James P. said the following:
>> I admit I have not expressed myself clearly. What I meant is
>> not that people should be disallowed to implement alternative
>> APIs, but rather that they should not feel the need to do it.
>>
>> In the Java world, JDBC is
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
>>> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
>>> place was :
>>>
>>> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
>>> we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:15 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 02:49 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
> The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
> recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
> does not mea
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:49 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
The point of the post is that there is no framework in particular to
recommend. I use my own packages for my needs. They suit me well. It
does not mean they will suit everybody.
>>> How would you know that there is no
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Matt Todd wrote:
Because of this, I determined to build my own framework. This was a
few months ago, and Canvas[1] was the result of my labor. I produced
this framework while working on numerous projects at the university I
work at. This allowed me to
Matt Todd wrote:
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(m
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(more generally) sem
2006/8/3, Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, a
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:43 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the follo
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:42 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
> > The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> > place was :
> >
> > "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
> >
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:32 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 02:01 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
> Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
> of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
> best
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> place was :
>
> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
> we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction layers that
>
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:17 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
> Arno Kuhl wrote:
>> I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
>> he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
>> in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 07:37 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
> PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
>
> :-)
Erm
Paul Scott is a good contributor of the PHPClasses site:
http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/author/145758.html
Several of his classes have been nominated to the PHP Programming
Innovation A
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:01 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
Anyway, you may want to read this more in depth reflection of the state
of the PHP framework world and recommendations on how to pick what suits
best for you:
http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommend
On Wed, August 2, 2006 9:50 am, Gabe wrote:
> Gabe wrote:
>> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
>> application development? There seems to be a number of them out
>> there,
>> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively
>> developed,
>> secure, etc et
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:43 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote:
> I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
> he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
> in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in a way only
> botanists can do)
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
> To: Paul Scott
> Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
>
> PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
>
> :-)
>
> Paul Scott wrote:
>>> You mean we should all be happy that
ochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
To: Paul Scott
Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> You mean we should all be happy that so much
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
>>
>
> I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
> Science, as far as "industry" is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
> on a PC. Fortunately
> You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
>
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as "industry" is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
on a PC. Fortunately for me, I am also a geek. My PHP experiences
started when ru
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 01:47 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 01:24 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
> >>> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> >>> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> >>> but I'm not su
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 01:24 AM Robert Cummings said the following:
>>> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
>>> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
>>> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
>>> secure,
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 00:29 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
> > What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> > application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> > but I'm not sure which one's ar
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
> Thou
Kilbride, James P. wrote:
> I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
> is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
> do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
> leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought
I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought of how they could be
abused and t
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
