On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:05 AM, tedd wrote:
> At 10:17 AM + 11/15/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>> Like someone mentioned on the link you posted; storing the images in the
>> database does offer a layer of security, as database access is far
>> easier to control than file access.
>>
>> Thanks
At 10:17 AM + 11/15/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Like someone mentioned on the link you posted; storing the images in the
database does offer a layer of security, as database access is far
easier to control than file access.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
It also offers ease of
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 16:43 +1300, German Geek wrote:
> Hi, Could it have something to do with an eof character being encoded or
> something like that? Do you really need to store the files in the DB? It
> uses more processing power if stored in the DB because on retrieval, you
> have to unescape
Hi, Could it have something to do with an eof character being encoded or
something like that? Do you really need to store the files in the DB? It
uses more processing power if stored in the DB because on retrieval, you
have to unescape the string and return it. Modern filesystems are optimised
bett
4 matches
Mail list logo
