Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-01-11 09:47:04 +0100:
>> Eli wrote:
>>> [extending include]
>>>
>>> Your solution is good when you know what variables you want to transfer
>>> ahead, and then make a list of them. But if I want to transfer all the
>>> variables in the current env
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-01-11 09:47:04 +0100:
> Eli wrote:
> > [extending include]
> >
> > Your solution is good when you know what variables you want to transfer
> > ahead, and then make a list of them. But if I want to transfer all the
> > variables in the current environment scope?
> as it s
Eli wrote:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
>> short of playing around with the global keyword
>> (which won't work when you call includeIt() from
>> another function)) your pretty much stuck.
>>
>> basically imho you need to rethink what it is your trying to do.
>>
>> function have their own scope for a reaso
Jochem Maas wrote:
short of playing around with the global keyword
(which won't work when you call includeIt() from
another function)) your pretty much stuck.
basically imho you need to rethink what it is your trying to do.
function have their own scope for a reason; maybe consider using
an arr
short of playing around with the global keyword
(which won't work when you call includeIt() from
another function)) your pretty much stuck.
basically imho you need to rethink what it is your trying to do.
function have their own scope for a reason; maybe consider using
an array argument like so:
Eli wrote:
Hi,
I want to create a function that does some stuff, and then includes
another file in the place from where it was called. The idea is to run
the included file not in the function, but in the place of the caller in
the caller's environment (not in the function environment).
For e
6 matches
Mail list logo
