Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs Static Builds

2004-02-05 Thread Jason Wong
On Friday 06 February 2004 00:44, John McKerrell wrote: > > 2. Why are the servers being restarted once a day ? There shouldn't be a > > need to restart unless something is going wrong. > > For cycling the logs, we've got scripts setup to sort them out each day > - backing them up and suchlike, wh

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs Static Builds

2004-02-05 Thread John McKerrell
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 16:12, vidyut luther wrote: > Hi John, > A couple of questions.. > 1. Define high load. Er.. that's quite a personal question, apparently we get 58 million hits a month but some days will be much busier than others (we're a soccer site, match days are busiest). The load is sp

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread Tariq Murtaza
Thanks very much John :) John Nichel wrote: It probably wouldn't help you all that much. Since it was for my own personal use, I hardcoded directory paths and such for my personal set up. I used to do it with a shell script too (nothing fancy there either). Just configure it again without ap

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread John Nichel
It probably wouldn't help you all that much. Since it was for my own personal use, I hardcoded directory paths and such for my personal set up. I used to do it with a shell script too (nothing fancy there either). Just configure it again without apxs ./configure --with-whateveroptions mak

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread Tariq Murtaza
Hi John, Can we share your Perl script? I compiled with switch "--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs" Is it that apache switch? Thanks Tariq John Nichel wrote: I went thru the same problem, so one day I just sat down, and wrote a Perl script that does the module and binary at the same time

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread John Nichel
I went thru the same problem, so one day I just sat down, and wrote a Perl script that does the module and binary at the same time. Saved me alot of grief. Scott Hurring wrote: If you do it correctly, yes. The apache module usually lives somewhere in the apache hierarchy, whereas the 'php' bin

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread ed
Thanks to all that replied. Ed On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, John Nichel wrote: > Yes you can. Just use clean source, but the config line can be the same > less the "--with-apache" switch. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Can I do that using the same src I used to create the dynamic module and > >

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread John Nichel
Yes you can. Just use clean source, but the config line can be the same less the "--with-apache" switch. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I do that using the same src I used to create the dynamic module and both would work hapilly together? Thanks, Ed On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, John Nichel wrote: N

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread Scott Hurring
If you do it correctly, yes. The apache module usually lives somewhere in the apache hierarchy, whereas the 'php' binary is '/usr/bin/' or '/usr/local/bin/', so they can quite happily co-exist. Beware though, when upgrading one, upgrade BOTH. It drove me nuts once when i forgot, and ended up havi

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread ed
Can I do that using the same src I used to create the dynamic module and both would work hapilly together? Thanks, Ed On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, John Nichel wrote: > No. To get the binary executable, compile it without the apache switch. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > When you compile php for

Re: [PHP] Dynamic vs. Static

2002-12-09 Thread John Nichel
No. To get the binary executable, compile it without the apache switch. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you compile php for apache using the dynamic module example used in the documentation, do you not get an exacutable php to use from the command line? Ed -- By-Tor.com It's all about the