"Jon Shoberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry
:)
>
> In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes
dynamic
> web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on
dynamic
> content or gives
Google doesn't choke at all on dynamic pages. pages get ranked by
keywords appearing on the page and even more importantly, the link
text of links on other pages pointing to the page that's being
indexed.
in other words, if a lot of sites link to your page like so:
google choke
then a search for
In article <9bho4e$r7p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Plutarck") wrote:
> Also be extremely careful about the use of and browser sniffing.
> So many sites do something classically stupid so that when someone sees
> their site in a search engine, the description is "Your browser does no
Check out this article :
Building Dynamic Pages With Search Engines in Mind :
http://phpbuilder.com/columns/tim2526.php3
Also, mod_rewrite related "stuff" has been discussed :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&s=mod_rewr
Getting listed in search engines really is important. But in the vein of
what you were talking about, people shouldn't really "worry" about it.
Note: Getting listed in directories like Yahoo is way more important than
having any search engine list you. You always receive a far more targeted
user
Jon Shoberg wrote:
> So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry :)
>
> In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes dynamic
> web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on dynamic
> content or gives those pages a lower
I'm not an expert in this, but I suspect that some search engines will
probably ignore URL's that look like this:
/path/to/dynamic.php?arg=1&foo=bar
because it sees the ? and knows that it's a dynamic result and perhaps
very likely to change.
I had always assumed that's why many sites (such as
I too would be interested in learning what others on this list might have to
say about this. Knowing how a search engine such as Google indexes a site
or a page might be a good starting point in answering this debate: dynamic
vs. static.
Jeff
So I was having a conversation with a manager/edu
you don't have to use fwrite() if you use output buffering.
just ob_start(), ob_get_contents(), and ob_end_clean()
and leave your code how it is.
-aaron
At 1:02 AM -0600 3/16/01, Richard Lynch wrote:
>You can use PHP to write out the HTML to a file, instead of using
>echo/print.
>
>You'll have
You can use PHP to write out the HTML to a file, instead of using
echo/print.
You'll have to fwrite() *ALL* your HTML, however.
I did this for a site that got burned into a CD once.
There are also some tools "out there" to "walk" a site and "steal" it, that
you could use on your "work" site to
Widget #42
Doohicky #13
\n";
}
?>
--
Visit the Zend Store at http://www.zend.com/store/
Wanna help me out? Like Music? Buy a CD: http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
Volunteer a little time: http://chatmusic.com/volunteer.htm
- Original Message -
From: "kaab kaoutar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11 matches
Mail list logo
