> Cake is licensed under the MIT license which is about as permissible as you
> can get.
Any Open Source code is permissable as long you don't tell anyone... :-)
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.phpguru.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net
Cake is licensed under the MIT license which is about as permissible as
you can get.
-Shawn
Raido wrote:
I have investigated some frameworks.. Zend and Codeiginiter but I
haven't done any testing/exercises. They seem to make things much more
simple/faster yes...but I'm not sure how much time
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 09:57 +, Raido wrote:
> I have investigated some frameworks.. Zend and Codeiginiter but I
> haven't done any testing/exercises. They seem to make things much more
> simple/faster yes...but I'm not sure how much time it will take to get
> know one of them(or CakePHP). A
I have investigated some frameworks.. Zend and Codeiginiter but I
haven't done any testing/exercises. They seem to make things much more
simple/faster yes...but I'm not sure how much time it will take to get
know one of them(or CakePHP). And I haven't got into reading
licences...I'm sure they h
Hélio Rocha wrote:
U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a framework
but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than cake and there are some IDE's
that do support and debug it.
Cumps,
Hélio Rocha
There's also .NET http://www.microsoft.com. It's also a framework but
f
Sorry Robert and all other users.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:03 +0100, Hélio Rocha wrote:
> > U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a
> framework
> > but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:03 +0100, Hélio Rocha wrote:
> U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a framework
> but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than cake and there are some IDE's
> that do support and debug it.
Dear Hélio,
This is a PHP list. People usually come h
U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a framework
but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than cake and there are some IDE's
that do support and debug it.
Cumps,
Hélio Rocha
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Micah Gersten wrot
Micah Gersten wrote:
Depending on the size of the site, you might want to consider a PHP
framework to start with. There's usually no point in reinventing the
wheel. Someone mentioned CakePHP which utilizes MVC. I'm looking into
porting my stuff to the Zend Framework which makes MVC optional, b
Depending on the size of the site, you might want to consider a PHP
framework to start with. There's usually no point in reinventing the
wheel. Someone mentioned CakePHP which utilizes MVC. I'm looking into
porting my stuff to the Zend Framework which makes MVC optional, but has
a lot of functio
Hi,
Even if it's just a site don't thing u don't need a structure to it. Why not
a MVC structure? U can dig about cakephp on google to see some of it
working. If U don't want to use a framework, start with the business rules
u'll need, after that do the CRUD and for the piece of resistance assembl
2008/7/30 Raido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> There are many sites explaining how to build new site etc but I'd like to
> hear what You suggest. (about how to plan whole thing and how to write
> separate parts which can be put together later)
This may be of some help:
http://www.phpguru.org/stat
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Raido wrote:
[snip lots of info]
I'm not sure but I have idea about what things I should do first:
1) think and write down any function that needs to be done(for
example different validations, functions for showing/posting form etc)
2) plan and create database?
13 matches
Mail list logo
