On 5/25/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/24/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I only skimmed this, but afaik the only way to get the child PID is to
> "fork" rather than to "exec".
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 10:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Summary:
>
On 5/24/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I only skimmed this, but afaik the only way to get the child PID is to
"fork" rather than to "exec".
On Thu, May 24, 2007 10:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Summary:
>
> 1. I execute script1 that will run in the background (daemon)
>
I only skimmed this, but afaik the only way to get the child PID is to
"fork" rather than to "exec".
On Thu, May 24, 2007 10:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Summary:
>
> 1. I execute script1 that will run in the background (daemon)
> 2. script1 needs to execute script2 and capture STDERR
3 matches
Mail list logo